Re: [PATCH v7 06/11] ARM: sunxi: Add initialization of CNTVOFF

[MylÃne Josserand]

Hello Maxime,

Thanks for your review.

On Mon, 23 Apr 2018 10:16:09 +0200
Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 11:10:17PM +0200, MylÃne Josserand wrote:
> > Add the initialization of CNTVOFF for sun8i-a83t.
> > 
> > For boot CPU, create a new machine that handles this
> > function's call in an "init_early" callback. We need to initialize
> > CNTVOFF before the arch timer's initialization otherwise, it will
> > not be taken into account and fails to boot correctly.
> > Because of that, this function can't be called in SMP's early_initcall
> > function which is called after timer's init.
> > 
> > For secondary CPUs, add this function into secondary_startup
> > assembly entry.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: MylÃne Josserand <mylene.josserand@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  arch/arm/mach-sunxi/headsmp.S |  1 +
> >  arch/arm/mach-sunxi/sunxi.c   | 20 +++++++++++++++++++-
> >  2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-sunxi/headsmp.S b/arch/arm/mach-sunxi/headsmp.S
> > index 37dc772701f3..32d76be98541 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/mach-sunxi/headsmp.S
> > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-sunxi/headsmp.S
> > @@ -71,6 +71,7 @@ ENDPROC(sunxi_mc_smp_cluster_cache_enable)
> >  
> >  ENTRY(sunxi_mc_smp_secondary_startup)
> >  	bl	sunxi_mc_smp_cluster_cache_enable
> > +	bl	secure_cntvoff_init
> >  	b	secondary_startup
> >  ENDPROC(sunxi_mc_smp_secondary_startup)
> >  
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-sunxi/sunxi.c b/arch/arm/mach-sunxi/sunxi.c
> > index 5e9602ce1573..ddc439f6269b 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/mach-sunxi/sunxi.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-sunxi/sunxi.c
> > @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
> >  #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> >  
> >  #include <asm/mach/arch.h>
> > +#include <asm/secure_cntvoff.h>
> >  
> >  static const char * const sunxi_board_dt_compat[] = {
> >  	"allwinner,sun4i-a10",
> > @@ -62,7 +63,6 @@ MACHINE_END
> >  static const char * const sun8i_board_dt_compat[] = {
> >  	"allwinner,sun8i-a23",
> >  	"allwinner,sun8i-a33",
> > -	"allwinner,sun8i-a83t",
> >  	"allwinner,sun8i-h2-plus",
> >  	"allwinner,sun8i-h3",
> >  	"allwinner,sun8i-r40",
> > @@ -75,6 +75,24 @@ DT_MACHINE_START(SUN8I_DT, "Allwinner sun8i Family")
> >  	.dt_compat	= sun8i_board_dt_compat,
> >  MACHINE_END
> >  
> > +void __init sun8i_cntvoff_init(void)
> > +{
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> > +	secure_cntvoff_init();
> > +#endif
> > +}
> > +
> > +static const char * const sun8i_cntvoff_board_dt_compat[] = {
> > +	"allwinner,sun8i-a83t",
> > +	NULL,
> > +};
> > +
> > +DT_MACHINE_START(SUN8I_CNTVOFF_DT, "Allwinner sun8i-a83t board")  
> 
> This name still doesn't really make much sense. It's an A83t, that's
> it.

True, I forgot this one, sorry.

> 
> Apart from the other minor comment I had, and once that name has been
> fixed:
> Acked-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Maxime
> 

Thank you!

Best regards,

-- 
MylÃne Josserand, Bootlin (formerly Free Electrons)
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://bootlin.com