Re: [PATCH v3] ASoC: da7219: read fmw property to get mclk for non-dts systems

From: Daniel Kurtz
Date: Mon May 07 2018 - 02:40:05 EST


On Sun, May 6, 2018 at 10:50 PM Agrawal, Akshu <Akshu.Agrawal@xxxxxxx>
wrote:



> On 5/4/2018 2:45 PM, Adam Thomson wrote:
> > On 03 May 2018 08:59, Akshu Agrawal wrote:
> >
> >> Non-dts based systems can use ACPI DSDT to pass on the mclk
> >> to da7219.
> >> This enables da7219 mclk to be linked to system clock.
> >> Enable/Disable of the mclk is already handled in the codec so
> >> platform drivers don't have to explicitly do handling of mclk.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Akshu Agrawal <akshu.agrawal@xxxxxxx>
> >> ---
> >> v2: Fixed kbuild error
> >> v3: Add corresponding clk_put for clk_get
> >> include/sound/da7219.h | 2 ++
> >> sound/soc/codecs/da7219.c | 10 +++++++++-
> >> 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/include/sound/da7219.h b/include/sound/da7219.h
> >> index 1bfcb16..df7ddf4 100644
> >> --- a/include/sound/da7219.h
> >> +++ b/include/sound/da7219.h
> >> @@ -38,6 +38,8 @@ struct da7219_pdata {
> >>
> >> const char *dai_clks_name;
> >>
> >> + const char *mclk_name;
> >> +
> >> /* Mic */
> >> enum da7219_micbias_voltage micbias_lvl;
> >> enum da7219_mic_amp_in_sel mic_amp_in_sel;
> >> diff --git a/sound/soc/codecs/da7219.c b/sound/soc/codecs/da7219.c
> >> index 980a6a8..ecd46fc 100644
> >> --- a/sound/soc/codecs/da7219.c
> >> +++ b/sound/soc/codecs/da7219.c
> >> @@ -1624,6 +1624,8 @@ static struct da7219_pdata
*da7219_fw_to_pdata(struct
> >> snd_soc_component *compone
> >> dev_warn(dev, "Using default clk name: %s\n",
> >> pdata->dai_clks_name);
> >>
> >> + device_property_read_string(dev, "dlg,mclk-name",
&pdata->mclk_name);
> >> +
> >
> > Personally am still not keen on this. To me the use of a
device_property_*
> > function suggests the same property resides in both DT and ACPI, but
here we're
> > only using this for the ACPI case. DT has no want or need for this. I
still feel
> > we should look at something more generic in the clock framework,
although I do
> > agree with Mark that this should be properly specced.
> >

> I am not an expert in field of ACPI, IMO forming a Spec and changing
> ACPI to have DT like clock framework is good to have but a bigger change
> which should be taken up later.

> The current code of handling of mclk in the driver is usable only by DT.
> The device_property (though ACPI specific) makes this code, a common
> code for DT and ACPI based devices.

> https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/acpi/DSD-properties-rules.txt
> "....Still, for the sake of code re-use, it may make sense to provide as
> much of the configuration data as possible in the form of device
> properties and complement that with an ACPI-specific mechanism suitable
> for the use case at hand......"

This sounds like a pretty reasonable justification for addressing the issue
using DSD to me.
For what its worth, you can add:

Reviewed-by: Daniel Kurtz <djkurtz@xxxxxxxxxxxx>



> Thanks,
> Akshu