Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] media: rc: introduce BPF_PROG_RAWIR_EVENT

From: Y Song
Date: Thu May 17 2018 - 12:06:56 EST

Next message: Mark Brown: "Re: [RFC] regmap: allow volatile register writes with cached only read maps"
Previous message: Linus Torvalds: "Re: Fw: [PATCHSET] workqueue: Show the latest workqueue name in /proc/PID/{comm,stat,status}"
In reply to: Sean Young: "Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] media: rc: introduce BPF_PROG_RAWIR_EVENT"
Next in thread: Sean Young: "Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] media: rc: introduce BPF_PROG_RAWIR_EVENT"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 2:04 PM, Sean Young <sean@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Add support for BPF_PROG_RAWIR_EVENT. This type of BPF program can call
> rc_keydown() to reported decoded IR scancodes, or rc_repeat() to report
> that the last key should be repeated.
>
> The bpf program can be attached to using the bpf(BPF_PROG_ATTACH) syscall;
> the target_fd must be the /dev/lircN device.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sean Young <sean@xxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/media/rc/Kconfig | 13 ++
> drivers/media/rc/Makefile | 1 +
> drivers/media/rc/bpf-rawir-event.c | 363 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/media/rc/lirc_dev.c | 24 ++
> drivers/media/rc/rc-core-priv.h | 24 ++
> drivers/media/rc/rc-ir-raw.c | 14 +-
> include/linux/bpf_rcdev.h | 30 +++
> include/linux/bpf_types.h | 3 +
> include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 55 ++++-
> kernel/bpf/syscall.c | 7 +
> 10 files changed, 531 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 drivers/media/rc/bpf-rawir-event.c
> create mode 100644 include/linux/bpf_rcdev.h
>
> diff --git a/drivers/media/rc/Kconfig b/drivers/media/rc/Kconfig
> index eb2c3b6eca7f..2172d65b0213 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/rc/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/media/rc/Kconfig
> @@ -25,6 +25,19 @@ config LIRC
> passes raw IR to and from userspace, which is needed for
> IR transmitting (aka "blasting") and for the lirc daemon.
>
> +config BPF_RAWIR_EVENT
> + bool "Support for eBPF programs attached to lirc devices"
> + depends on BPF_SYSCALL
> + depends on RC_CORE=y
> + depends on LIRC
> + help
> + Allow attaching eBPF programs to a lirc device using the bpf(2)
> + syscall command BPF_PROG_ATTACH. This is supported for raw IR
> + receivers.
> +
> + These eBPF programs can be used to decode IR into scancodes, for
> + IR protocols not supported by the kernel decoders.
> +
> menuconfig RC_DECODERS
> bool "Remote controller decoders"
> depends on RC_CORE
> diff --git a/drivers/media/rc/Makefile b/drivers/media/rc/Makefile
> index 2e1c87066f6c..74907823bef8 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/rc/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/media/rc/Makefile
> @@ -5,6 +5,7 @@ obj-y += keymaps/
> obj-$(CONFIG_RC_CORE) += rc-core.o
> rc-core-y := rc-main.o rc-ir-raw.o
> rc-core-$(CONFIG_LIRC) += lirc_dev.o
> +rc-core-$(CONFIG_BPF_RAWIR_EVENT) += bpf-rawir-event.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_IR_NEC_DECODER) += ir-nec-decoder.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_IR_RC5_DECODER) += ir-rc5-decoder.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_IR_RC6_DECODER) += ir-rc6-decoder.o
> diff --git a/drivers/media/rc/bpf-rawir-event.c b/drivers/media/rc/bpf-rawir-event.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..7cb48b8d87b5
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/media/rc/bpf-rawir-event.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,363 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +// bpf-rawir-event.c - handles bpf
> +//
> +// Copyright (C) 2018 Sean Young <sean@xxxxxxxx>
> +
> +#include <linux/bpf.h>
> +#include <linux/filter.h>
> +#include <linux/bpf_rcdev.h>
> +#include "rc-core-priv.h"
> +
> +/*
> + * BPF interface for raw IR
> + */
> +const struct bpf_prog_ops rawir_event_prog_ops = {
> +};
> +
> +BPF_CALL_1(bpf_rc_repeat, struct bpf_rawir_event*, event)
> +{
> + struct ir_raw_event_ctrl *ctrl;
> +
> + ctrl = container_of(event, struct ir_raw_event_ctrl, bpf_rawir_event);
> +
> + rc_repeat(ctrl->dev);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static const struct bpf_func_proto rc_repeat_proto = {
> + .func = bpf_rc_repeat,
> + .gpl_only = true, /* rc_repeat is EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL */
> + .ret_type = RET_INTEGER,
> + .arg1_type = ARG_PTR_TO_CTX,
> +};
> +
> +BPF_CALL_4(bpf_rc_keydown, struct bpf_rawir_event*, event, u32, protocol,
> + u32, scancode, u32, toggle)
> +{
> + struct ir_raw_event_ctrl *ctrl;
> +
> + ctrl = container_of(event, struct ir_raw_event_ctrl, bpf_rawir_event);
> +
> + rc_keydown(ctrl->dev, protocol, scancode, toggle != 0);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static const struct bpf_func_proto rc_keydown_proto = {
> + .func = bpf_rc_keydown,
> + .gpl_only = true, /* rc_keydown is EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL */
> + .ret_type = RET_INTEGER,
> + .arg1_type = ARG_PTR_TO_CTX,
> + .arg2_type = ARG_ANYTHING,
> + .arg3_type = ARG_ANYTHING,
> + .arg4_type = ARG_ANYTHING,
> +};
> +
> +static const struct bpf_func_proto *
> +rawir_event_func_proto(enum bpf_func_id func_id, const struct bpf_prog *prog)
> +{
> + switch (func_id) {
> + case BPF_FUNC_rc_repeat:
> + return &rc_repeat_proto;
> + case BPF_FUNC_rc_keydown:
> + return &rc_keydown_proto;
> + case BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem:
> + return &bpf_map_lookup_elem_proto;
> + case BPF_FUNC_map_update_elem:
> + return &bpf_map_update_elem_proto;
> + case BPF_FUNC_map_delete_elem:
> + return &bpf_map_delete_elem_proto;
> + case BPF_FUNC_ktime_get_ns:
> + return &bpf_ktime_get_ns_proto;
> + case BPF_FUNC_tail_call:
> + return &bpf_tail_call_proto;
> + case BPF_FUNC_get_prandom_u32:
> + return &bpf_get_prandom_u32_proto;
> + case BPF_FUNC_trace_printk:
> + if (capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN))
> + return bpf_get_trace_printk_proto();
> + /* fall through */
> + default:
> + return NULL;
> + }
> +}
> +
> +static bool rawir_event_is_valid_access(int off, int size,
> + enum bpf_access_type type,
> + const struct bpf_prog *prog,
> + struct bpf_insn_access_aux *info)
> +{
> + /* struct bpf_rawir_event has two u32 fields */
> + if (type == BPF_WRITE)
> + return false;
> +
> + if (size != sizeof(__u32))
> + return false;
> +
> + if (!(off == offsetof(struct bpf_rawir_event, duration) ||
> + off == offsetof(struct bpf_rawir_event, type)))
> + return false;
> +
> + return true;
> +}
> +
> +const struct bpf_verifier_ops rawir_event_verifier_ops = {
> + .get_func_proto = rawir_event_func_proto,
> + .is_valid_access = rawir_event_is_valid_access
> +};
> +
> +#define BPF_MAX_PROGS 64
> +
> +static int rc_dev_bpf_attach(struct rc_dev *rcdev, struct bpf_prog *prog)
> +{
> + struct ir_raw_event_ctrl *raw;
> + struct bpf_prog_list *pl;
> + int ret, size;
> +
> + if (rcdev->driver_type != RC_DRIVER_IR_RAW)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + ret = mutex_lock_interruptible(&ir_raw_handler_lock);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + raw = rcdev->raw;
> + if (!raw) {
> + ret = -ENODEV;
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> + size = 0;
> + list_for_each_entry(pl, &raw->progs, node) {
> + if (pl->prog == prog) {
> + ret = -EEXIST;
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> + size++;
> + }
> +
> + if (size >= BPF_MAX_PROGS) {
> + ret = -E2BIG;
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> + pl = kmalloc(sizeof(*pl), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!pl) {
> + ret = -ENOMEM;
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> + pl->prog = prog;
> + list_add(&pl->node, &raw->progs);
> +out:
> + mutex_unlock(&ir_raw_handler_lock);
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int rc_dev_bpf_detach(struct rc_dev *rcdev, struct bpf_prog *prog)
> +{
> + struct ir_raw_event_ctrl *raw;
> + struct bpf_prog_list *pl, *tmp;
> + int ret;
> +
> + if (rcdev->driver_type != RC_DRIVER_IR_RAW)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + ret = mutex_lock_interruptible(&ir_raw_handler_lock);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + raw = rcdev->raw;
> + if (!raw) {
> + ret = -ENODEV;
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> + ret = -ENOENT;
> +
> + list_for_each_entry_safe(pl, tmp, &raw->progs, node) {
> + if (pl->prog == prog) {
> + list_del(&pl->node);
> + kfree(pl);
> + bpf_prog_put(prog);
> + ret = 0;
> + goto out;
> + }
> + }
> +out:
> + mutex_unlock(&ir_raw_handler_lock);
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +void rc_dev_bpf_init(struct rc_dev *rcdev)
> +{
> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&rcdev->raw->progs);
> +}
> +
> +void rc_dev_bpf_run(struct rc_dev *rcdev, struct ir_raw_event ev)
> +{
> + struct ir_raw_event_ctrl *raw = rcdev->raw;
> + struct bpf_prog_list *pl;
> +
> + if (list_empty(&raw->progs))
> + return;
> +
> + if (unlikely(ev.carrier_report)) {
> + raw->bpf_rawir_event.carrier = ev.carrier;
> + raw->bpf_rawir_event.type = BPF_RAWIR_EVENT_CARRIER;
> + } else {
> + raw->bpf_rawir_event.duration = ev.duration;
> +
> + if (ev.pulse)
> + raw->bpf_rawir_event.type = BPF_RAWIR_EVENT_PULSE;
> + else if (ev.timeout)
> + raw->bpf_rawir_event.type = BPF_RAWIR_EVENT_TIMEOUT;
> + else if (ev.reset)
> + raw->bpf_rawir_event.type = BPF_RAWIR_EVENT_RESET;
> + else
> + raw->bpf_rawir_event.type = BPF_RAWIR_EVENT_SPACE;
> + }
> +
> + list_for_each_entry(pl, &raw->progs, node)
> + BPF_PROG_RUN(pl->prog, &raw->bpf_rawir_event);

Is the raw->progs protected by locks? It is possible that attaching/detaching
could manipulate raw->progs at the same time? In perf/cgroup prog array
case, the prog array run is protected by rcu and the dummy prog idea is
to avoid the prog is skipped by reshuffling.

Also, the original idea about using prog array is the least overhead since you
want to BPF programs to execute as soon as possible.

> +}
> +
> +void rc_dev_bpf_free(struct rc_dev *rcdev)
> +{
> + struct bpf_prog_list *pl, *tmp;
> +
> + list_for_each_entry_safe(pl, tmp, &rcdev->raw->progs, node) {
> + list_del(&pl->node);
> + bpf_prog_put(pl->prog);
> + kfree(pl);
> + }
> +}
> +
> +int rc_dev_prog_attach(const union bpf_attr *attr)
> +{
> + struct bpf_prog *prog;
> + struct rc_dev *rcdev;
> + int ret;
> +
> + if (attr->attach_flags)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + prog = bpf_prog_get_type(attr->attach_bpf_fd,
> + BPF_PROG_TYPE_RAWIR_EVENT);
> + if (IS_ERR(prog))
> + return PTR_ERR(prog);
> +
> + rcdev = rc_dev_get_from_fd(attr->target_fd);
> + if (IS_ERR(rcdev)) {
> + bpf_prog_put(prog);
> + return PTR_ERR(rcdev);
> + }
> +
> + ret = rc_dev_bpf_attach(rcdev, prog);
> + if (ret)
> + bpf_prog_put(prog);
> +
> + put_device(&rcdev->dev);
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +int rc_dev_prog_detach(const union bpf_attr *attr)
> +{
> + struct bpf_prog *prog;
> + struct rc_dev *rcdev;
> + int ret;
> +
> + if (attr->attach_flags)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + prog = bpf_prog_get_type(attr->attach_bpf_fd,
> + BPF_PROG_TYPE_RAWIR_EVENT);
> + if (IS_ERR(prog))
> + return PTR_ERR(prog);
> +
> + rcdev = rc_dev_get_from_fd(attr->target_fd);
> + if (IS_ERR(rcdev)) {
> + bpf_prog_put(prog);
> + return PTR_ERR(rcdev);
> + }
> +
> + ret = rc_dev_bpf_detach(rcdev, prog);
> +
> + bpf_prog_put(prog);
> + put_device(&rcdev->dev);
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +int rc_dev_prog_query(const union bpf_attr *attr, union bpf_attr __user *uattr)
> +{
> + __u32 __user *prog_ids = u64_to_user_ptr(attr->query.prog_ids);
> + struct ir_raw_event_ctrl *raw;
> + struct bpf_prog_list *pl;
> + struct rc_dev *rcdev;
> + u32 cnt, flags = 0, *ids, i;
> + int ret;
> +
> + if (attr->query.query_flags)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + rcdev = rc_dev_get_from_fd(attr->query.target_fd);
> + if (IS_ERR(rcdev))
> + return PTR_ERR(rcdev);
> +
> + if (rcdev->driver_type != RC_DRIVER_IR_RAW) {
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> + goto out;

mutex_lock_interruptible() has not been called. You can just return here.

> + }
> +
> + ret = mutex_lock_interruptible(&ir_raw_handler_lock);
> + if (ret)
> + goto out;

Maybe you can rename label "out" to "unlock" since it
is really an unlock and out?

> +
> + raw = rcdev->raw;
> + if (!raw) {
> + ret = -ENODEV;
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> + cnt = 0;
> + list_for_each_entry(pl, &raw->progs, node)
> + cnt++;
> +
> + if (copy_to_user(&uattr->query.prog_cnt, &cnt, sizeof(cnt))) {
> + ret = -EFAULT;
> + goto out;
> + }
> + if (copy_to_user(&uattr->query.attach_flags, &flags, sizeof(flags))) {
> + ret = -EFAULT;
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> + if (attr->query.prog_cnt != 0 && prog_ids && cnt) {
> + if (attr->query.prog_cnt < cnt)
> + cnt = attr->query.prog_cnt;
> +
> + ids = kmalloc_array(cnt, sizeof(u32), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!ids) {
> + ret = -ENOMEM;
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> + i = 0;
> + list_for_each_entry(pl, &raw->progs, node) {
> + ids[i++] = pl->prog->aux->id;
> + if (i == cnt)
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + ret = copy_to_user(prog_ids, ids, cnt * sizeof(u32));

Do you want to give user a chance to know that the "cnt" is not big enough
by return -ENOSPC if cnt is smaller than the number of progs in the array?

> + }
> +out:
> + mutex_unlock(&ir_raw_handler_lock);
> + put_device(&rcdev->dev);
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> diff --git a/drivers/media/rc/lirc_dev.c b/drivers/media/rc/lirc_dev.c
> index 24e9fbb80e81..193540ded626 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/rc/lirc_dev.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/rc/lirc_dev.c
> @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@
> #include <linux/module.h>
> #include <linux/mutex.h>
> #include <linux/device.h>
> +#include <linux/file.h>
> #include <linux/idr.h>
> #include <linux/poll.h>
> #include <linux/sched.h>
> @@ -816,4 +817,27 @@ void __exit lirc_dev_exit(void)
> unregister_chrdev_region(lirc_base_dev, RC_DEV_MAX);
> }
>
> +struct rc_dev *rc_dev_get_from_fd(int fd)
> +{
> + struct fd f = fdget(fd);
> + struct lirc_fh *fh;
> + struct rc_dev *dev;
> +
> + if (!f.file)
> + return ERR_PTR(-EBADF);
> +
> + if (f.file->f_op != &lirc_fops) {
> + fdput(f);
> + return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> + }
> +
> + fh = f.file->private_data;
> + dev = fh->rc;
> +
> + get_device(&dev->dev);
> + fdput(f);
> +
> + return dev;
> +}
> +
> MODULE_ALIAS("lirc_dev");
> diff --git a/drivers/media/rc/rc-core-priv.h b/drivers/media/rc/rc-core-priv.h
> index e0e6a17460f6..148db73cfa0c 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/rc/rc-core-priv.h
> +++ b/drivers/media/rc/rc-core-priv.h
> @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
> #define MAX_IR_EVENT_SIZE 512
>
> #include <linux/slab.h>
> +#include <uapi/linux/bpf.h>
> #include <media/rc-core.h>
>
> /**
> @@ -57,6 +58,11 @@ struct ir_raw_event_ctrl {
> /* raw decoder state follows */
> struct ir_raw_event prev_ev;
> struct ir_raw_event this_ev;
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_BPF_RAWIR_EVENT
> + struct bpf_rawir_event bpf_rawir_event;
> + struct list_head progs;
> +#endif
> struct nec_dec {
> int state;
> unsigned count;
> @@ -126,6 +132,9 @@ struct ir_raw_event_ctrl {
> } imon;
> };
>
> +/* Mutex for locking raw IR processing and handler change */
> +extern struct mutex ir_raw_handler_lock;
> +
> /* macros for IR decoders */
> static inline bool geq_margin(unsigned d1, unsigned d2, unsigned margin)
> {
> @@ -288,6 +297,7 @@ void ir_lirc_raw_event(struct rc_dev *dev, struct ir_raw_event ev);
> void ir_lirc_scancode_event(struct rc_dev *dev, struct lirc_scancode *lsc);
> int ir_lirc_register(struct rc_dev *dev);
> void ir_lirc_unregister(struct rc_dev *dev);
> +struct rc_dev *rc_dev_get_from_fd(int fd);
> #else
> static inline int lirc_dev_init(void) { return 0; }
> static inline void lirc_dev_exit(void) {}
> @@ -299,4 +309,18 @@ static inline int ir_lirc_register(struct rc_dev *dev) { return 0; }
> static inline void ir_lirc_unregister(struct rc_dev *dev) { }
> #endif
>
> +/*
> + * bpf interface
> + */
> +#ifdef CONFIG_BPF_RAWIR_EVENT
> +void rc_dev_bpf_init(struct rc_dev *dev);
> +void rc_dev_bpf_free(struct rc_dev *dev);
> +void rc_dev_bpf_run(struct rc_dev *dev, struct ir_raw_event ev);
> +#else
> +static inline void rc_dev_bpf_init(struct rc_dev *dev) { }
> +static inline void rc_dev_bpf_free(struct rc_dev *dev) { }
> +static inline void rc_dev_bpf_run(struct rc_dev *dev, struct ir_raw_event ev)
> +{ }
> +#endif
> +
> #endif /* _RC_CORE_PRIV */
> diff --git a/drivers/media/rc/rc-ir-raw.c b/drivers/media/rc/rc-ir-raw.c
> index 374f83105a23..e68cdd4fbf5d 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/rc/rc-ir-raw.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/rc/rc-ir-raw.c
> @@ -14,7 +14,7 @@
> static LIST_HEAD(ir_raw_client_list);
>
> /* Used to handle IR raw handler extensions */
> -static DEFINE_MUTEX(ir_raw_handler_lock);
> +DEFINE_MUTEX(ir_raw_handler_lock);
> static LIST_HEAD(ir_raw_handler_list);
> static atomic64_t available_protocols = ATOMIC64_INIT(0);
>
> @@ -32,6 +32,7 @@ static int ir_raw_event_thread(void *data)
> handler->protocols || !handler->protocols)
> handler->decode(raw->dev, ev);
> ir_lirc_raw_event(raw->dev, ev);
> + rc_dev_bpf_run(raw->dev, ev);
> raw->prev_ev = ev;
> }
> mutex_unlock(&ir_raw_handler_lock);
> @@ -572,6 +573,7 @@ int ir_raw_event_prepare(struct rc_dev *dev)
> spin_lock_init(&dev->raw->edge_spinlock);
> timer_setup(&dev->raw->edge_handle, ir_raw_edge_handle, 0);
> INIT_KFIFO(dev->raw->kfifo);
> + rc_dev_bpf_init(dev);
>
> return 0;
> }
> @@ -621,9 +623,17 @@ void ir_raw_event_unregister(struct rc_dev *dev)
> list_for_each_entry(handler, &ir_raw_handler_list, list)
> if (handler->raw_unregister)
> handler->raw_unregister(dev);
> - mutex_unlock(&ir_raw_handler_lock);
> +
> + rc_dev_bpf_free(dev);
>
> ir_raw_event_free(dev);
> +
> + /*
> + * A user can be calling bpf(BPF_PROG_{QUERY|ATTACH|DETACH}), so
> + * ensure that the raw member is null on unlock; this is how
> + * "device gone" is checked.
> + */
> + mutex_unlock(&ir_raw_handler_lock);
> }
>
> /*
> diff --git a/include/linux/bpf_rcdev.h b/include/linux/bpf_rcdev.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..17a30f30436a
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/include/linux/bpf_rcdev.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
> +#ifndef _BPF_RCDEV_H
> +#define _BPF_RCDEV_H
> +
> +#include <linux/bpf.h>
> +#include <uapi/linux/bpf.h>
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_BPF_RAWIR_EVENT
> +int rc_dev_prog_attach(const union bpf_attr *attr);
> +int rc_dev_prog_detach(const union bpf_attr *attr);
> +int rc_dev_prog_query(const union bpf_attr *attr, union bpf_attr __user *uattr);
> +#else
> +static inline int rc_dev_prog_attach(const union bpf_attr *attr)
> +{
> + return -EINVAL;
> +}
> +
> +static inline int rc_dev_prog_detach(const union bpf_attr *attr)
> +{
> + return -EINVAL;
> +}
> +
> +static inline int rc_dev_prog_query(const union bpf_attr *attr,
> + union bpf_attr __user *uattr)
> +{
> + return -EINVAL;
> +}
> +#endif
> +
> +#endif /* _BPF_RCDEV_H */
> diff --git a/include/linux/bpf_types.h b/include/linux/bpf_types.h
> index b67f8793de0d..e2b1b12474d4 100644
> --- a/include/linux/bpf_types.h
> +++ b/include/linux/bpf_types.h
> @@ -25,6 +25,9 @@ BPF_PROG_TYPE(BPF_PROG_TYPE_RAW_TRACEPOINT, raw_tracepoint)
> #ifdef CONFIG_CGROUP_BPF
> BPF_PROG_TYPE(BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_DEVICE, cg_dev)
> #endif
> +#ifdef CONFIG_BPF_RAWIR_EVENT
> +BPF_PROG_TYPE(BPF_PROG_TYPE_RAWIR_EVENT, rawir_event)
> +#endif
>
> BPF_MAP_TYPE(BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARRAY, array_map_ops)
> BPF_MAP_TYPE(BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_ARRAY, percpu_array_map_ops)
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
> index d94d333a8225..243e141e8a5b 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
> @@ -141,6 +141,7 @@ enum bpf_prog_type {
> BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_MSG,
> BPF_PROG_TYPE_RAW_TRACEPOINT,
> BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_SOCK_ADDR,
> + BPF_PROG_TYPE_RAWIR_EVENT,
> };
>
> enum bpf_attach_type {
> @@ -158,6 +159,7 @@ enum bpf_attach_type {
> BPF_CGROUP_INET6_CONNECT,
> BPF_CGROUP_INET4_POST_BIND,
> BPF_CGROUP_INET6_POST_BIND,
> + BPF_RAWIR_EVENT,
> __MAX_BPF_ATTACH_TYPE
> };
>
> @@ -1902,6 +1904,35 @@ union bpf_attr {
> * egress otherwise). This is the only flag supported for now.
> * Return
> * **SK_PASS** on success, or **SK_DROP** on error.
> + *
> + * int bpf_rc_keydown(void *ctx, u32 protocol, u32 scancode, u32 toggle)
> + * Description
> + * Report decoded scancode with toggle value. For use in
> + * BPF_PROG_TYPE_RAWIR_EVENT, to report a successfully
> + * decoded scancode. This is will generate a keydown event,
> + * and a keyup event once the scancode is no longer repeated.
> + *
> + * *ctx* pointer to bpf_rawir_event, *protocol* is decoded
> + * protocol (see RC_PROTO_* enum).
> + *
> + * Some protocols include a toggle bit, in case the button
> + * was released and pressed again between consecutive scancodes,
> + * copy this bit into *toggle* if it exists, else set to 0.
> + *
> + * Return
> + * Always return 0 (for now)
> + *
> + * int bpf_rc_repeat(void *ctx)
> + * Description
> + * Repeat the last decoded scancode; some IR protocols like
> + * NEC have a special IR message for repeat last button,
> + * in case user is holding a button down; the scancode is
> + * not repeated.
> + *
> + * *ctx* pointer to bpf_rawir_event.
> + *
> + * Return
> + * Always return 0 (for now)
> */
> #define __BPF_FUNC_MAPPER(FN) \
> FN(unspec), \
> @@ -1976,7 +2007,9 @@ union bpf_attr {
> FN(fib_lookup), \
> FN(sock_hash_update), \
> FN(msg_redirect_hash), \
> - FN(sk_redirect_hash),
> + FN(sk_redirect_hash), \
> + FN(rc_repeat), \
> + FN(rc_keydown),
>
> /* integer value in 'imm' field of BPF_CALL instruction selects which helper
> * function eBPF program intends to call
> @@ -2043,6 +2076,26 @@ enum bpf_hdr_start_off {
> BPF_HDR_START_NET,
> };
>
> +/*
> + * user accessible mirror of in-kernel ir_raw_event
> + */
> +#define BPF_RAWIR_EVENT_SPACE 0
> +#define BPF_RAWIR_EVENT_PULSE 1
> +#define BPF_RAWIR_EVENT_TIMEOUT 2
> +#define BPF_RAWIR_EVENT_RESET 3
> +#define BPF_RAWIR_EVENT_CARRIER 4
> +#define BPF_RAWIR_EVENT_DUTY_CYCLE 5
> +
> +struct bpf_rawir_event {
> + union {
> + __u32 duration;
> + __u32 carrier;
> + __u32 duty_cycle;
> + };
> +
> + __u32 type;
> +};
> +
> /* user accessible mirror of in-kernel sk_buff.
> * new fields can only be added to the end of this structure
> */
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
> index e2aeb5e89f44..75c089f407c8 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
> @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
> */
> #include <linux/bpf.h>
> #include <linux/bpf_trace.h>
> +#include <linux/bpf_rcdev.h>
> #include <linux/btf.h>
> #include <linux/syscalls.h>
> #include <linux/slab.h>
> @@ -1567,6 +1568,8 @@ static int bpf_prog_attach(const union bpf_attr *attr)
> case BPF_SK_SKB_STREAM_PARSER:
> case BPF_SK_SKB_STREAM_VERDICT:
> return sockmap_get_from_fd(attr, BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_SKB, true);
> + case BPF_RAWIR_EVENT:
> + return rc_dev_prog_attach(attr);
> default:
> return -EINVAL;
> }
> @@ -1637,6 +1640,8 @@ static int bpf_prog_detach(const union bpf_attr *attr)
> case BPF_SK_SKB_STREAM_PARSER:
> case BPF_SK_SKB_STREAM_VERDICT:
> return sockmap_get_from_fd(attr, BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_SKB, false);
> + case BPF_RAWIR_EVENT:
> + return rc_dev_prog_detach(attr);
> default:
> return -EINVAL;
> }
> @@ -1684,6 +1689,8 @@ static int bpf_prog_query(const union bpf_attr *attr,
> case BPF_CGROUP_SOCK_OPS:
> case BPF_CGROUP_DEVICE:
> break;
> + case BPF_RAWIR_EVENT:
> + return rc_dev_prog_query(attr, uattr);
> default:
> return -EINVAL;
> }
> --
> 2.17.0
>

Next message: Mark Brown: "Re: [RFC] regmap: allow volatile register writes with cached only read maps"
Previous message: Linus Torvalds: "Re: Fw: [PATCHSET] workqueue: Show the latest workqueue name in /proc/PID/{comm,stat,status}"
In reply to: Sean Young: "Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] media: rc: introduce BPF_PROG_RAWIR_EVENT"
Next in thread: Sean Young: "Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] media: rc: introduce BPF_PROG_RAWIR_EVENT"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]