Re: mmotm 2018-05-17-16-26 uploaded (autofs)

[Ian Kent]

On 18/05/18 08:21, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 05/17/2018 04:26 PM, akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>> The mm-of-the-moment snapshot 2018-05-17-16-26 has been uploaded to
>>
>>    http://www.ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmotm/
>>
>> mmotm-readme.txt says
>>
>> README for mm-of-the-moment:
>>
>> http://www.ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmotm/
>>
>> This is a snapshot of my -mm patch queue.  Uploaded at random hopefully
>> more than once a week.
>>
>> You will need quilt to apply these patches to the latest Linus release (4.x
>> or 4.x-rcY).  The series file is in broken-out.tar.gz and is duplicated in
>> http://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmotm/series
>>
>> The file broken-out.tar.gz contains two datestamp files: .DATE and
>> .DATE-yyyy-mm-dd-hh-mm-ss.  Both contain the string yyyy-mm-dd-hh-mm-ss,
>> followed by the base kernel version against which this patch series is to
>> be applied.
>>
>> This tree is partially included in linux-next.  To see which patches are
>> included in linux-next, consult the `series' file.  Only the patches
>> within the #NEXT_PATCHES_START/#NEXT_PATCHES_END markers are included in
>> linux-next.
>>
>> A git tree which contains the memory management portion of this tree is
>> maintained at git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mhocko/mm.git
>> by Michal Hocko.  It contains the patches which are between the
>> "#NEXT_PATCHES_START mm" and "#NEXT_PATCHES_END" markers, from the series
>> file, http://www.ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmotm/series.
>>
>>
>> A full copy of the full kernel tree with the linux-next and mmotm patches
>> already applied is available through git within an hour of the mmotm
>> release.  Individual mmotm releases are tagged.  The master branch always
>> points to the latest release, so it's constantly rebasing.
> 
> 
> on x86_64: with (randconfig):
> CONFIG_AUTOFS_FS=y
> CONFIG_AUTOFS4_FS=y

Oh right, I need to make these exclusive.

I seem to remember trying to do that along the way, can't remember why
I didn't do it in the end.

Any suggestions about potential problems when doing it?

Thanks,
Ian