Re: [PATCH v3 5/6] spi: at91-usart: add driver for at91-usart as spi

From: Radu Pirea
Date: Wed May 23 2018 - 03:15:47 EST




On 05/17/2018 08:04 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 01:38:21PM +0300, Radu Pirea wrote:

+config SPI_AT91_USART
+ tristate "Atmel USART Controller as SPI"
+ depends on HAS_DMA
+ depends on (ARCH_AT91 || COMPILE_TEST)
+ select MFD_AT91_USART
+ help
+ This selects a driver for the AT91 USART Controller as SPI Master,
+ present on AT91 and SAMA5 SoC series.
+

This looks like there's some tab/space mixing going on here.

+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/*
+ * Driver for AT91 USART Controllers as SPI
+ *
+ * Copyright (C) 2018 Microchip Technology Inc.

Make the entire block a C++ comment so it looks more intentional rather
tha mixing C and C++.

Hi Mark,

I know it's ugly, but SPDX license identifier must be in a separate comment block.


+static inline void at91_usart_spi_tx(struct at91_usart_spi *aus)
+{
+ unsigned int len = aus->current_transfer->len;
+ unsigned int remaining = aus->current_tx_remaining_bytes;
+ const u8 *tx_buf = aus->current_transfer->tx_buf;
+
+ if (tx_buf && remaining) {
+ if (at91_usart_spi_tx_ready(aus))
+ spi_writel(aus, THR, tx_buf[len - remaining]);
+ aus->current_tx_remaining_bytes--;

Missing braces here - we only write to the FIFO if there's space but we
unconditionally decrement the counter.


Thanks. I will fix it.

+ } else {
+ if (at91_usart_spi_tx_ready(aus))
+ spi_writel(aus, THR, US_DUMMY_TX);
+ }
+}

This looks like you're open coding SPI_CONTROLLER_MUST_TX

+ int len = aus->current_transfer->len;
+ int remaining = aus->current_rx_remaining_bytes;
+ u8 *rx_buf = aus->current_transfer->rx_buf;
+
+ if (aus->current_rx_remaining_bytes) {
+ rx_buf[len - remaining] = spi_readb(aus, RHR);
+ aus->current_rx_remaining_bytes--;
+ } else {
+ spi_readb(aus, RHR);
+ }

Similarly for _MUST_RX.

+ controller->flags = SPI_MASTER_MUST_RX | SPI_MASTER_MUST_TX;

You're actually setting both flags... this means that the handling for
cases with missing TX or RX buffers can't happen.

Sorry. My mistake. I will remove unnecessary code.