Re: [PATCH 4/5] remoteproc: rename subdev probe and remove functions

[Arnaud Pouliquen]

Hello Alex


We have the same needs (prepare unprepare steps) on our platform. We
tested you core patches and they answers to our need.

Just a remark below

On 05/15/2018 10:53 PM, Alex Elder wrote:
> Rename functions used when subdevices are started and stopped to
> reflect the new naming scheme.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/remoteproc/qcom_common.c     | 16 ++++++++--------
>  drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c |  8 ++++----
>  2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_common.c b/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_common.c
> index 4ae87c5b8793..6f77840140bf 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_common.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_common.c
> @@ -33,7 +33,7 @@
>  
>  static BLOCKING_NOTIFIER_HEAD(ssr_notifiers);
>  
> -static int glink_subdev_probe(struct rproc_subdev *subdev)
> +static int glink_subdev_start(struct rproc_subdev *subdev)
>  {
>  	struct qcom_rproc_glink *glink = to_glink_subdev(subdev);
>  
> @@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ static int glink_subdev_probe(struct rproc_subdev *subdev)
>  	return PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(glink->edge);
>  }
>  
> -static void glink_subdev_remove(struct rproc_subdev *subdev, bool crashed)
> +static void glink_subdev_stop(struct rproc_subdev *subdev, bool crashed)
>  {
>  	struct qcom_rproc_glink *glink = to_glink_subdev(subdev);
>  
> @@ -64,8 +64,8 @@ void qcom_add_glink_subdev(struct rproc *rproc, struct qcom_rproc_glink *glink)
>  		return;
>  
>  	glink->dev = dev;
> -	glink->subdev.start = glink_subdev_probe;
> -	glink->subdev.stop = glink_subdev_remove;
> +	glink->subdev.start = glink_subdev_start;
> +	glink->subdev.stop = glink_subdev_stop;
>  
>  	rproc_add_subdev(rproc, &glink->subdev);
>  }
> @@ -129,7 +129,7 @@ int qcom_register_dump_segments(struct rproc *rproc,
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(qcom_register_dump_segments);
>  
> -static int smd_subdev_probe(struct rproc_subdev *subdev)
> +static int smd_subdev_start(struct rproc_subdev *subdev)
>  {
>  	struct qcom_rproc_subdev *smd = to_smd_subdev(subdev);
>  
> @@ -138,7 +138,7 @@ static int smd_subdev_probe(struct rproc_subdev *subdev)
>  	return PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(smd->edge);
>  }
>  
> -static void smd_subdev_remove(struct rproc_subdev *subdev, bool crashed)
> +static void smd_subdev_stop(struct rproc_subdev *subdev, bool crashed)
>  {
>  	struct qcom_rproc_subdev *smd = to_smd_subdev(subdev);
>  
> @@ -160,8 +160,8 @@ void qcom_add_smd_subdev(struct rproc *rproc, struct qcom_rproc_subdev *smd)
>  		return;
>  
>  	smd->dev = dev;
> -	smd->subdev.start = smd_subdev_probe;
> -	smd->subdev.stop = smd_subdev_remove;
> +	smd->subdev.start = smd_subdev_start;
> +	smd->subdev.stop = smd_subdev_stop;
>  
>  	rproc_add_subdev(rproc, &smd->subdev);
>  }
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> index ca39fad175f2..2ede7ae6f5bc 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> @@ -301,14 +301,14 @@ void rproc_free_vring(struct rproc_vring *rvring)
>  	rsc->vring[idx].notifyid = -1;
>  }
>  
> -static int rproc_vdev_do_probe(struct rproc_subdev *subdev)
> +static int rproc_vdev_do_start(struct rproc_subdev *subdev)
>  {
>  	struct rproc_vdev *rvdev = container_of(subdev, struct rproc_vdev, subdev);
>  
>  	return rproc_add_virtio_dev(rvdev, rvdev->id);
>  }
>  
> -static void rproc_vdev_do_remove(struct rproc_subdev *subdev, bool crashed)
> +static void rproc_vdev_do_stop(struct rproc_subdev *subdev, bool crashed)
>  {
>  	struct rproc_vdev *rvdev = container_of(subdev, struct rproc_vdev, subdev);
>  
> @@ -399,8 +399,8 @@ static int rproc_handle_vdev(struct rproc *rproc, struct fw_rsc_vdev *rsc,
>  
>  	list_add_tail(&rvdev->node, &rproc->rvdevs);
>  
> -	rvdev->subdev.start = rproc_vdev_do_probe;
> -	rvdev->subdev.stop = rproc_vdev_do_remove;
> +	rvdev->subdev.start = rproc_vdev_do_start;
> +	rvdev->subdev.stop = rproc_vdev_do_stop;
>  
>  	rproc_add_subdev(rproc, &rvdev->subdev);

Could you split in 2 patches one for the core another, the other for the
glink driver?

Regards
Arnaud