Re: [PATCH 5/8] integrity: Add exe= and tty= before res= to integrity audits

[Stefan Berger]

On 05/29/2018 05:19 PM, Paul Moore wrote:
> On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 4:11 PM, Stefan Berger
> <stefanb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Use the new public audit functions to add the exe= and tty=
> > parts to the integrity audit records. We place them before
> > res=.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Stefan Berger <stefanb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Suggested-by: Steve Grubb <sgrubb@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >   security/integrity/integrity_audit.c | 2 ++
> >   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/security/integrity/integrity_audit.c b/security/integrity/integrity_audit.c
> > index db30763d5525..8d25d3c4dcca 100644
> > --- a/security/integrity/integrity_audit.c
> > +++ b/security/integrity/integrity_audit.c
> > @@ -56,6 +56,8 @@ void integrity_audit_msg(int audit_msgno, struct inode *inode,
> >                  audit_log_untrustedstring(ab, inode->i_sb->s_id);
> >                  audit_log_format(ab, " ino=%lu", inode->i_ino);
> >          }
> > +       audit_log_d_path_exe(ab, current->mm);
> > +       audit_log_tty(ab, current);
> NACK
>
> Please add the new fields to the end of the audit record, thank you.

I put it there since Steve said '"res" is traditionally the last field 
in any event' (https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/5/22/539). I don't mind 
breaking with this tradition...

> >          audit_log_format(ab, " res=%d", !result);
> >          audit_log_end(ab);
> >   }