Re: [PATCH 03/11] spi: Add a driver for the Freescale/NXP QuadSPI controller

From: Frieder Schrempf
Date: Fri Jun 01 2018 - 05:16:02 EST


Hi Yogesh,

On 30.05.2018 16:24, Boris Brezillon wrote:
Hi Yogesh,

On Wed, 30 May 2018 13:50:51 +0000
Yogesh Narayan Gaur <yogeshnarayan.gaur@xxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi Frieder,

Thanks for migrating the fsl-quadspi.c driver on the new SPI
framework. This patch is using dynamic LUT approach to create the LUT
at run time instead of fixed static LUT as being used in current
driver present at mtd/spi-nor/fsl-quadspi.c. I have pushed the
changes for dynamic LUT on mtd/spi-nor/fsl-quadspi.c and v10 has been
in review stage.

Request you to please add 'signed-off' mentioned in those patches in
this patch, patchwork link is
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/896534/

So for reasons already given by Boris, I won't add your S-o-b tags. But I can add your name (and that of Suresh Gupta?) to the file header and as MODULE_AUTHOR in the next version.

Regards,

Frieder


First, I'd like to state that this work has not been based on your
dynamic LUT code, and I actually asked you to adapt your code to match
the way we were handling it in the new driver (which at that time was
still under development). Then, even if you want to be cited as one of
the author of the new code, SoB tag is not the right way to do it (see
[1] for an explanation on when SoB should be added). Instead, you
should add your name in the copyright header and maybe be add a
MODULE_AUTHOR():

/*
* Copyright ...
* ...
* Authors:
* ...
* Yogesh Narayan Gaur <yogeshnarayan.gaur@xxxxxxx>
*/

...

MODULE_AUTHOR("Yogesh Narayan Gaur <yogeshnarayan.gaur@xxxxxxx>");

Regards,

Boris

[1]https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/source/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst#L429