Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] PCI: Avoid panic when PCI IO resource's size is not page aligned

From: Yisheng Xie
Date: Tue Jun 05 2018 - 22:13:31 EST


Hi Bjorn,

On 2018/6/6 7:53, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 08:18:18PM +0800, Yisheng Xie wrote:
>> Zhou reported a bug on Hisilicon arm64 D06 platform with 64KB page size:
>>
>> [ 2.470908] kernel BUG at lib/ioremap.c:72!
>> [ 2.475079] Internal error: Oops - BUG: 0 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
>> [ 2.480551] Modules linked in:
>> [ 2.483594] CPU: 1 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 4.16.0-rc7-00062-g0b41260-dirty #23
>> [ 2.491756] Hardware name: Huawei D06/D06, BIOS Hisilicon D06 UEFI Nemo 2.0 RC0 - B120 03/23/2018
>> [ 2.500614] pstate: 80c00009 (Nzcv daif +PAN +UAO)
>> [ 2.505395] pc : ioremap_page_range+0x268/0x36c
>> [ 2.509912] lr : pci_remap_iospace+0xe4/0x100
>> [...]
>> [ 2.603733] Call trace:
>> [ 2.606168] ioremap_page_range+0x268/0x36c
>> [ 2.610337] pci_remap_iospace+0xe4/0x100
>> [ 2.614334] acpi_pci_probe_root_resources+0x1d4/0x214
>> [ 2.619460] pci_acpi_root_prepare_resources+0x18/0xa8
>> [ 2.624585] acpi_pci_root_create+0x98/0x214
>> [ 2.628843] pci_acpi_scan_root+0x124/0x20c
>> [ 2.633013] acpi_pci_root_add+0x224/0x494
>> [ 2.637096] acpi_bus_attach+0xf8/0x200
>> [ 2.640918] acpi_bus_attach+0x98/0x200
>> [ 2.644740] acpi_bus_attach+0x98/0x200
>> [ 2.648562] acpi_bus_scan+0x48/0x9c
>> [ 2.652125] acpi_scan_init+0x104/0x268
>> [ 2.655948] acpi_init+0x308/0x374
>> [ 2.659337] do_one_initcall+0x48/0x14c
>> [ 2.663160] kernel_init_freeable+0x19c/0x250
>> [ 2.667504] kernel_init+0x10/0x100
>> [ 2.670979] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x18
>>
>> The cause is the size of PCI IO resource is 32KB, which is 4K aligned but
>> not 64KB aligned, however, ioremap_page_range() request the range as page
>> aligned or it will trigger a BUG_ON() on ioremap_pte_range() it calls, as
>> ioremap_pte_range increase the addr by PAGE_SIZE, which makes addr != end
>> until trigger BUG_ON, if its incoming end is not page aligned. More detail
>> trace is as following:
>>
>> ioremap_page_range
>> -> ioremap_p4d_range
>> -> ioremap_p4d_range
>> -> ioremap_pud_range
>> -> ioremap_pmd_range
>> -> ioremap_pte_range
>>
>> This patch avoid panic by return -EINVAL if vaddr or resource size is not
>> page aligned.
>>
>> Reported-by: Zhou Wang <wangzhou1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Tested-by: Xiaojun Tan <tanxiaojun@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Yisheng Xie <xieyisheng1@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> v3:
>> - pci_remap_iospace() sanitize its arguments instead - per Rafael
>>
>> v2:
>> - Let the caller of ioremap_page_range() align the request by PAGE_SIZE - per Toshi
>>
>> drivers/pci/pci.c | 3 +++
>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci.c b/drivers/pci/pci.c
>> index dbfe7c4..0eb0381 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pci/pci.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pci/pci.c
>> @@ -3544,6 +3544,9 @@ int pci_remap_iospace(const struct resource *res, phys_addr_t phys_addr)
>> if (res->end > IO_SPACE_LIMIT)
>> return -EINVAL;
>>
>> + if (!PAGE_ALIGNED(vaddr) || !PAGE_ALIGNED(resource_size(res)))
>> + return -EINVAL;
>
> Most other callers of ioremap_page_range() are in the ioremap() path,
> and they align phys_addr themselves. In some cases that results in a
> mapping that covers more than necessary. For instance, see the
> function comment at the x86 version of __ioremap_caller().
>
> Is there any reason we couldn't similarly align vaddr and phys_addr
> here?
>
> The acpi_pci_probe_root_resources() path you mention above basically
> ignores the errors you're returning. Your patches will avoid the
> panic, which is an improvement, but I/O port space will not work, and
> I don't see anything that gives the user a hint about why not.
>
> If we could align vaddr and phys_addr (and possibly map more than
> necessary), I/O port space would still work.

Right, I will send another version, soon.

Thanks
Yisheng
>
>> return ioremap_page_range(vaddr, vaddr + resource_size(res), phys_addr,
>> pgprot_device(PAGE_KERNEL));
>> #else
>> --
>> 1.7.12.4
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
> .
>