Re: [PATCH 1/2] kernel/SRCU: provide a static initializer

From: Paul E. McKenney
Date: Thu Jun 07 2018 - 03:31:13 EST


On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 01:09:57PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 7:26 PM, Paul E. McKenney
> <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 07:14:49PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >> On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 2:04 PM, Paul E. McKenney
> >> <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> > On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 10:09:51AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >> >> On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 12:19 PM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
> >> >> <bigeasy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> >> > There are macros for static initializer for the three out of four
> >> >> > possible notifier types, that are:
> >> >> > ATOMIC_NOTIFIER_HEAD()
> >> >> > BLOCKING_NOTIFIER_HEAD()
> >> >> > RAW_NOTIFIER_HEAD()
> >> >> >
> >> >> > This patch provides a static initilizer for the forth type to make it
> >> >> > complete.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> >> > Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> >>
> >> >> I cannot apply this without an ACK from Paul.
> >> >
> >> > I have both queued, but if you would prefer to take them, then for the
> >> > SRCU piece:
> >> >
> >> > Tested-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> > Reviewed-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>
> >> Thanks!
> >>
> >> I'll route them along with the other cpufreq material then.
> >
> > Please let me know when you have them queued so that I can remove
> > them from -rcu.
>
> I've just added them to my linux-next branch.

And I have removed them, thank you!

Thanx, Paul