Re: linux-next: manual merge of the regulator tree with the arm-soc tree

From: Linus Walleij
Date: Mon Jun 11 2018 - 07:49:55 EST

On Mon, Jun 4, 2018 at 12:46 PM, Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 01, 2018 at 12:49:53AM +0200, Janusz Krzysztofik wrote:
>> I confirm the fix by Stephen works for me, however, the conflicting patch by
>> Linus breaks things a bit.
>> Lookup tables added to board files use function name "enable" while the
>> regulator uses NULL. As a result, GPIO descriptor is not matched and not
>> assigned to the regulator which ends up running with no control over GPIO pin.
>> Either the regulator driver should use the function name "enable" or that name
>> should be removed from lookup tables.
> I'll revert this one as well :(

I see this is a generic problem, no idea why I didn't pass these
unnamed as NULL in the first place, probably my ignorance as usual.

I fixed it up in my patch making them all anonymous and rebasing
the rest as well. Let's see how it looks after the merge window.

I will also need to rebase on top of Janusz changes and then it
will look even better.

Janusz: would be super if you could test my patches after that!

Linus Walleij