Re: INFO: task hung in __sb_start_write
From: Tetsuo Handa
Date: Fri Jun 15 2018 - 15:41:41 EST
On 2018/06/15 18:19, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 12:33 PM, Tetsuo Handa
> <penguin-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On 2018/06/11 16:39, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 9:30 AM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>> On Sun, Jun 10, 2018 at 11:47:56PM +0900, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
>>>>> This looks quite strange that nobody is holding percpu_rw_semaphore for
>>>>> write but everybody is stuck trying to hold it for read. (Since there
>>>>> is no "X locks held by ..." line without followup "#0:" line, there is
>>>>> no possibility that somebody is in TASK_RUNNING state while holding
>>>>> percpu_rw_semaphore for write.)
>>>>> I feel that either API has a bug or API usage is wrong.
>>>>> Any idea for debugging this?
>>>> Look at percpu_rwsem_release() and usage. The whole fs freezer thing is
>>> Do you mean that we froze fs? We tried to never-ever issue
>>> ioctl(FIFREEZE) during fuzzing. Are there other ways to do this?
>> Dmitry, can you try this patch? If you can get
> I've tried replying 5 logs with this patch, but I don't see that we
> return to user-space with locks held, nor deadlock reports.
Did you succeed to reproduce khungtaskd messages with this patch?
If yes, was one of sb_writers#X/sb_pagefaults/sb_internal printed there?
If no, we would want a git tree for testing under syzbot.
> What I've noticed is that all these logs contain lots of error
> messages around block subsystem. Perhaps if we can identify the common
> denominator across error messages in different logs, we can find the
> one responsible for hangs.
While there are lots of error messages around block subsystem, how can
down_read() fail to continue unless up_write() somehow failed to wake up
waiters sleeping at down_read(), assuming that khungtaskd says that none
of sb_writers#X/sb_pagefaults/sb_internal was held?
Hmm, there might be other locations calling percpu_rwsem_release() ?