Re: [PATCH V4 2/4] watchdog: stm32: add pclk feature for stm32mp1

[Alexandre Torgue]

Hi Guenter,


> > But you are right I forgot to change stm32f429.dtsi.
> > If I add a commit for stm32f429.dtsi, it's Ok for you ?
>
> Not really. You are imposing a personal preference on others,
> and you would make stm32f429.dtsi inconsistent since it doesn't
> use clock names for anything else.This in turn means that people
> will have an endless source of irritation since they will need
> a clock name for this node but not for others.

Why? This kind of implementation depends on each driver. Isn't ?

Or do you mean that if iwdg driver uses this implementation (clock name 
usage) all nodes inside stm32f429.dtsi should follow the same 
implementation ?

> You will have to get the arm and DT maintainers to agree on this change.

As this patch makes easier integration of new platform, I agree with 
Ludovic proposition.


regards
Alex

> Thanks,
> Guenter