Re: [PATCH v11 00/27] ARM: davinci: convert to common clock frameworkâ

[David Lechner]

On 06/26/2018 07:56 AM, Sekhar Nori wrote:
> On Friday 25 May 2018 11:51 PM, David Lechner wrote:
> > On 05/22/2018 04:38 AM, Sekhar Nori wrote:
> > > Hi David,
> > >
> > > On Friday 18 May 2018 10:18 PM, David Lechner wrote:
> > > > This series converts mach-davinci to use the common clock framework.
> > > >
> > > > The series works like this, the first 3 patches fix some issues with
> > > > the clock
> > > > drivers that have already been accepted into the mainline kernel.
> > > >
> > > > Then, starting with "ARM: davinci: pass clock as parameter to
> > > > davinci_timer_init()", we get the mach code ready for the switch by
> > > > adding the
> > > > code needed for the new clock drivers and adding #ifndef
> > > > CONFIG_COMMON_CLK
> > > > around the legacy clocks so that we can switch easily between the old
> > > > and the
> > > > new.
> > > >
> > > > "ARM: davinci: switch to common clock framework" actually flips the
> > > > switch
> > > > to start using the new clock drivers. Then the next 8 patches remove all
> > > > of the old clock code.
> > > >
> > > > The final four patches add device tree clock support to the one SoC that
> > > > supports it.
> > > >
> > > > This series has been tested on TI OMAP-L138 LCDK (both device tree
> > > > and legacy
> > > > board file).
> > >
> > > If you do end up sending a v12, you can leave out the mach-davinci
> > > portions unless there are any changes you need to make. I will pick them
> > > up from this series once the driver dependencies are merged.
> > >
> > > I do hope the drivers/clk/* changes can be merged from v4.18.
> >
> > I have resent all of the clk patches (including all of the ones I listed as
> > dependencies in addition to the three remaining in this series) under the
> > cover "clk: davinci: outstanding fixesâ".
> >
> > I also found that we need to add power-domains properties to the PWM nodes
> > in "ARM: dts: da850: Add clocks". I probably should just take your advice
> > and just globally added them even if they are not documented for some types
> > ofnodes.
>
> I think doing it en masse will be controversial. Just add it to PWM
> nodes for now (I am assuming the binding documentation agrees).
>
> I have applied this series so please send any more changes as follow-on
> patches.
>
> Thanks
> Sekhar

FYI, there are some CPU frequency scaling patches that I was playing around
with, but I don't plan on submitting them since they aren't much use to me
at the moment. If anyone would like to pick them up, you can find them at
https://github.com/dlech/linux/tree/da850-dt-cpufreq.