Re: [PATCH RESEND] clang-format: Set IndentWrappedFunctionNames false

From: Miguel Ojeda
Date: Wed Jun 27 2018 - 10:07:52 EST


On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 9:33 PM, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 05:05:40PM +0200, Miguel Ojeda wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 12:44 AM, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > The true option causes this indenting for functions:
>> >
>> > static struct something_very_very_long *
>> > function(void *arg)
>> > {
>> >
>> > While a quick survey suggests that the usual Linux fallback is the GNU
>> > style:
>> >
>> > static struct something_very_very_long *
>> > function(void *arg)
>> > {
>> >
>> > Eg as seen in:
>> >
>> > kernel/cpu.c
>> > kernel/fork.c
>> > etc
>> >
>> > Acked-by: Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> > Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> > .clang-format | 2 +-
>> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>> >
>> > Resending outside the merge window with no change..
>> >
>> > If there is no clear upstream path for this file (it has no
>> > MAINTAINERS entry?) I could take it to Linus via the rdma.git tree, eg
>>
>> We can add an specific entry, yeah. Is there any policy for "general
>> files" (or some general/catch-all entry)?
>>
>> > as a 'collectively maintained' file.
>>
>> As you prefer -- I can also pick it up through auxdisplay; but I am
>> not sure if we should put it in any "unrelated" tree, though. (Since
>> the file will not probably receive many patches, I originally thought
>> that it would be picked up by Andrew or some other "general" tree
>> instead.)
>
> Well, I'd rather you take it as the owner of the file, honestly :)
> Along with a MAINTAINERS update...

OK -- I will send the MAINTAINERS update patch :)

>
> I also don't know too well what the policy is for these sorts of files
> - other catch all files like kernel.h I run through rdma.git from time
> to time, but that is in relation to patches that depend on them..
>
>> > Would prefer Miguel's Ack to do that though. Looks like Andrew Morton
>> > took the original patch introducing the file?
>>
>> Yep, I sent it to Andrew and he kindly picked it up. Probably he
>> didn't notice this one.
>>
>> As for the patch:
>>
>> Acked-by: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> Lets give Andrew some time, he is probably very busy. If it gets to
> rc5 without it getting picked up one of us can grab it instead to help
> out..

Sure! :)

(and thanks!)

Cheers,
Miguel

>
> Thanks,
> Jason