Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: msm: Pass along set_wake failures

From: Linus Walleij
Date: Fri Jun 29 2018 - 03:59:13 EST


On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 1:45 AM Evan Green <evgreen@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> The MSM pinctrl driver quietly swallows errors that occur
> when trying to call .irq_set_wake. It should instead pass
> those failures up the chain so the caller can react to them.
> Swallowing the error for instance causes gpio_keys to think that
> it was able to successfully set a wake IRQ, when in fact it may
> not have been, causing the following warning on resume:
>
> [ 53.777819] Unbalanced IRQ 9 wake disable
> [ 53.781979] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1362 at kernel/irq/manage.c:623
> irq_set_irq_wake+0xac/0x12c
> [ 53.794758] Modules linked in: spi_gpio spi_bitbang qcom_q6v5_pil
> qcom_common cfg80211 ip6table_filter smsc95xx usbnet mii
> [ 54.016419] [<ffffff80081054b0>] irq_set_irq_wake+0xac/0x12c
> [ 54.022252] [<ffffff80083c86a4>] msm_gpio_irq_set_wake+0x48/0x68
> [ 54.028447] [<ffffff8008104d8c>] set_irq_wake_real+0x50/0x5c
> [ 54.034275] [<ffffff80081054d0>] irq_set_irq_wake+0xcc/0x12c
> [ 54.040104] [<ffffff800860fd00>] gpio_keys_resume+0x74/0xd8
> [ 54.045846] [<ffffff800852018c>] platform_pm_resume+0x54/0x60
> [ 54.051771] [<ffffff800852ceb4>] dpm_run_callback+0x104/0x210
> [ 54.057694] [<ffffff800852d7cc>] device_resume+0x178/0x1b0
> [ 54.063355] [<ffffff800852e938>] dpm_resume+0x1c4/0x38c
> [ 54.068745] [<ffffff800852efac>] dpm_resume_end+0x20/0x34
> [ 54.074315] [<ffffff80080fe700>] suspend_devices_and_enter+0x518/0x964
> [ 54.081044] [<ffffff80080ff1dc>] pm_suspend+0x690/0x6e0
> [ 54.086433] [<ffffff80080fd0f8>] state_store+0xd4/0xf8
> [ 54.091733] [<ffffff80088a3af0>] kobj_attr_store+0x18/0x28
> [ 54.097396] [<ffffff80082980a4>] sysfs_kf_write+0x5c/0x68
> [ 54.102961] [<ffffff8008297050>] kernfs_fop_write+0x174/0x1b8
> [ 54.108887] [<ffffff800821a9c0>] __vfs_write+0x58/0x160
> [ 54.114276] [<ffffff800821acd4>] vfs_write+0xcc/0x184
> [ 54.119487] [<ffffff800821af4c>] SyS_write+0x64/0xb4
>
> Signed-off-by: Evan Green <evgreen@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

BjÃrn is this patch OK with you? Seems fine to me.

Yours,
Linus Walleij