Re: [PATCH v3 4/6] bus: ti-sysc: Add support for software reset

From: Faiz Abbas
Date: Tue Jul 03 2018 - 03:28:30 EST


On Tuesday 03 July 2018 12:37 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx> [180611 07:06]:
>> * Faiz Abbas <faiz_abbas@xxxxxx> [180611 06:48]:
>>> Hi,
>>> On Monday 11 June 2018 11:59 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
>>>> * Faiz Abbas <faiz_abbas@xxxxxx> [180611 06:28]:
>>>>> Great. I thought I completely misunderstood you. But I don't see what
>>>>> adding another function will accomplish. A QUIRK flag used in the same
>>>>> function would work well enough>
>>>> Fine with me as long as the function stays simple for both
>>>> syss and sysc reset.
>>> In general a reset status bit being in sysstatus is the norm and it
>>> being in sysconfig should be the "quirk" for which a flag needs to be
>>> added. What do you think?
>> Sure makes sense to me.
>>> As an aside, naming bitshifts by the name of the platform they were
>>> originally added in seems weird. There should be some generic mask
>>> saying "soft reset is the 0th bit". Currently I am using
>>> SYSC_OMAP4_SOFTRESET for a dra76x module. I guess it depends on how many
>>> different sysconfig types we have.
>> Sure we could have a macro for that.
> So what's the conclusion on this one? Are you going to do one
> more version of the ti-sysc driver patch?

Yes. I have just now been able to get back to this. Will post a v4 by