Re: [PATCH v5 4/5] ARM: dts: at91: sama5d2: add nodes for I2S controllers

[Codrin Ciubotariu]

On 06.07.2018 22:39, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> Hi Codrin,
>
> On 18/06/2018 17:12:38+0300, Codrin Ciubotariu wrote:
> > From: Cyrille Pitchen <cyrille.pitchen@xxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > This patch adds DT nodes for I2S0 and I2S1. It also adds an alias for
> > each I2S node.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Cyrille Pitchen <cyrille.pitchen@xxxxxxxxx>
> > [codrin.ciubotariu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx: added phandle to new mux clock]
> > Signed-off-by: Codrin Ciubotariu <codrin.ciubotariu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >
> > The bindings for the I2S node are applied to broonie/sound.git .
> >
> > Changes in v5:
> > 	- the previous name was:
> > 	  [PATCH v4 6/7] ARM: dts: at91: sama5d2: add nodes for I2S controllers
> >
> >   arch/arm/boot/dts/sama5d2.dtsi | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >   1 file changed, 34 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sama5d2.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sama5d2.dtsi
> > index eeb6afa1cda7..eca73ce40bc5 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sama5d2.dtsi
> > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sama5d2.dtsi
> > @@ -58,6 +58,8 @@
> >   		serial1 = &uart3;
> >   		tcb0 = &tcb0;
> >   		tcb1 = &tcb1;
> > +		i2s0 = &i2s0;
> > +		i2s1 = &i2s1;
> >   	};
> >   
> >   	cpus {
> > @@ -1313,6 +1315,22 @@
> >   				clocks = <&clk32k>;
> >   			};
> >   
> > +			i2s0: i2s@f8050000 {
> > +				compatible = "atmel,sama5d2-i2s";
> > +				reg = <0xf8050000 0x100>;
> > +				interrupts = <54 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH 7>;
> > +				dmas = <&dma0
> > +					(AT91_XDMAC_DT_MEM_IF(0) | AT91_XDMAC_DT_PER_IF(1) |
> > +					 AT91_XDMAC_DT_PERID(31))>,
> > +				       <&dma0
> > +					(AT91_XDMAC_DT_MEM_IF(0) | AT91_XDMAC_DT_PER_IF(1) |
> > +					 AT91_XDMAC_DT_PERID(32))>;
> > +				dma-names = "tx", "rx";
> > +				clocks = <&i2s0_clk>, <&i2s0_gclk>, <&audio_pll_pmc>, <&i2s0muxck>;
> > +				clock-names = "pclk", "gclk", "aclk", "muxclk";
> > +				status = "disabled";
> > +			};
> > +
>
> Can you resend the DTS patches after removing the unnecessary clocks?

I will. Should I also make the "muxclk" clock an assigned clock to 
assign its parent ?

Thanks and best regards,
Codrin