Re: [PATCH v3] devres: Explicitly align datai[] to 64-bit

From: Peter Zijlstra
Date: Mon Jul 09 2018 - 11:34:45 EST

Next message: Stephen Boyd: "Re: [PATCH 2/3] pinctrl: msm: Mux out gpio function with gpio_request()"
Previous message: Steven Rostedt: "Re: ftrace performance (sched events): cyclictest shows 25% more latency"
In reply to: Mark Rutland: "Re: [PATCH v3] devres: Explicitly align datai[] to 64-bit"
Next in thread: Peter Zijlstra: "Re: [PATCH v3] devres: Explicitly align datai[] to 64-bit"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Mon, Jul 09, 2018 at 04:29:58PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> Shouldn't that be 8? AFAICT, __alignof__(unsigned long long) is 8 on
> x86_32:

Curious, I wonder why we put that align in atomic64_32 then.

Next message: Stephen Boyd: "Re: [PATCH 2/3] pinctrl: msm: Mux out gpio function with gpio_request()"
Previous message: Steven Rostedt: "Re: ftrace performance (sched events): cyclictest shows 25% more latency"
In reply to: Mark Rutland: "Re: [PATCH v3] devres: Explicitly align datai[] to 64-bit"
Next in thread: Peter Zijlstra: "Re: [PATCH v3] devres: Explicitly align datai[] to 64-bit"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]