Re: cpu_no_speculation omissions?

[Thomas Gleixner]

On Mon, 16 Jul 2018, Rich Felker wrote:

> At least the Centerton (late-generation Bonnell uarch) Atom family is
> omitted from the cpu_no_speculation table added by commit fec9434a12f3
> to arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c. Is this intentional? Would a patch
> adding it and possibly other omissions be welcome?

Probably. Dave?

Thanks,

	tglx