Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: exynos5: add missing interrupts for pwm node

[Anand Moon]

Hi Krzysztof

On 18 July 2018 at 17:25, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 18 July 2018 at 12:50, Anand Moon <linux.amoon@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Hi Krzysztof,
>>
>> On 18 July 2018 at 16:03, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> On 18 July 2018 at 12:30, Anand Moon <linux.amoon@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>> Hi
>>>>
>>>> On 18 July 2018 at 15:27, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>> On 18 July 2018 at 11:34, Anand Moon <linux.amoon@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>> Add missing GIC interrupts property for pwm nodes.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Anand Moon <linux.amoon@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>  arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5.dtsi | 5 +++++
>>>>>>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5.dtsi
>>>>>> index 5d2f0a0..9406108 100644
>>>>>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5.dtsi
>>>>>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5.dtsi
>>>>>> @@ -169,6 +169,11 @@
>>>>>>                 pwm: pwm@12dd0000 {
>>>>>>                         compatible = "samsung,exynos4210-pwm";
>>>>>>                         reg = <0x12DD0000 0x100>;
>>>>>> +                       interrupts = <GIC_SPI 36 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
>>>>>> +                                  <GIC_SPI 37 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
>>>>>
>>>>> Indentation here looks weird - spaces used after tabs but not aligned
>>>>> with first entry. Please indent it properly and align it.
>>>>>
>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>> Krzysztof
>>>>
>>>> I ram checkpatch before I submit this patch it shown no error.
>>>>
>>>> # scripts/checkpatch.pl --no-signoff -q
>>>> 0001-ARM-dts-exynos5-add-missing-interrupts-for-pwm-node.patch
>>>
>>> That's good, thank you. Still when I look at it in patchwork the
>>> indentation is wrong:
>>> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10531753/
>>> However it can be patchwork's fault, so are you sure that this is
>>> properly indented and aligned?
>>>
>>> BR,
>>> Krzysztof
>>
>> I prefer vim and I use following plugin
>>
>> https://github.com/vivien/vim-linux-coding-style
>>
>> root@odroidxu4:/usr/src/odroidxu4-4kr-devel# wget -nv
>> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10531753/mbox/ -O pwm.patch
>> 2018-07-18 10:48:09
>> URL:https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10531753/mbox/ [1460] ->
>> "pwm.patch" [1]
>> root@odroidxu4:/usr/src/odroidxu4-4kr-devel#
>> root@odroidxu4:/usr/src/odroidxu4-4kr-devel# scripts/checkpatch.pl
>> --no-signoff -q pwm.patch
>> root@odroidxu4:/usr/src/odroidxu4-4kr-devel#
>>
>> Is their any other way to test checkpatch please let me know.
>
> This is trivial thing and should be fixed after my first reply. But
> clearly we need to waste some more time... so I applied the patch to
> check whether patchwork shows it properly or not... and it is the
> same. Indentation is wrong.
>
> Please fix the weird alignment. You have existing examples in the DTSI
> file (rtc node) how to do it. Current indentation is clearly wrong -
> why using spaces after tab if this is not aligned properly?
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof

Opps sorry I have send v2 patch
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10532443/ with proper fix.

I will do strict check next time before sending the patch.

Best Regards
-Anand