Re: [PATCH 0/5] ti_am335x_tsc: Enable wakeup capability

[Vignesh R]

On Monday 23 July 2018 11:07 AM, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Jul 2018, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> 
>> On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 08:47:36AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
>>> On Tue, 17 Jul 2018, Vignesh R wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Dmitry,
>>>>
>>>> On Saturday 30 June 2018 04:03 PM, Vignesh R wrote:
>>>>> On AM335x, resistive TSC can wakeup the system from low power state.
>>>>> Currently, parent MFD device is marked as wakeup source, which is
>>>>> inaccurate as its the touch event generated by TSC thats the wakeup
>>>>> source. This series moves all wakeup related calls to operate on TSC
>>>>> device instead of MFD. It also marks TSC IRQ as wakeup capable, so that
>>>>> its not disabled during system suspend.
>>>>>
>>>>> This series is based on Dmitry's comments here:
>>>>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/4/24/65
>>>>>
>>>>> There are many new patches in this series, hence did not mark this as v4.
>>>>>
>>>>> Vignesh R (5):
>>>>>   mfd: ti_am335x_tscadc: Don't mark TSCADC MFD as wakeup capable
>>>>>   Input: ti_am335x_tsc: Mark TSC device as wakeup source
>>>>>   mfd: ti_am335x_tscadc: Keep ADC interface on if child is wakeup
>>>>>     capable
>>>>>   iio: adc: ti_am335x_adc: Disable ADC during suspend unconditionally
>>>>>   Input: ti_am335x_tsc: Mark IRQ as wakeup capable
>>>>>
>>>>>  drivers/iio/adc/ti_am335x_adc.c           | 12 ++++--------
>>>>>  drivers/input/touchscreen/ti_am335x_tsc.c | 22 +++++++++++++++++-----
>>>>>  drivers/mfd/ti_am335x_tscadc.c            | 14 +++++++++++++-
>>>>>  3 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Gentle ping... Could you review/pick this series? MFD amd IIO bits are
>>>> already ACKed
>>>
>>> MFD patches are reviewed "for my own reference" meaning that we
>>> haven't yet agreed on a merge plan yet.
>>
>> I think this series makes sense to be pushed through a single tree as
>> opposed to being spread between 3, even if it could technically be
>> possible. It looks like Jonathan is fine with going it through either
>> his or some other tree, I am fine with it going through MFD.
> 
> I'm happy either way.
> 
Thanks Dmitry, Jonathan and Lee Jones!

Could this be applied to one of the trees now? MFD perhaps?

-- 
Regards
Vignesh