Re: [PATCH 00/14] arm64: dts: meson-axg: add audio support
From: Martin Blumenstingl
Date: Wed Jul 25 2018 - 17:26:47 EST
On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 11:19 PM <jbrunet@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, 2018-07-25 at 21:11 +0200, Martin Blumenstingl wrote:
> > nit-pick: one patch uses "arm64: dts: meson-axg: s400" in the subject
> > while other patches that are touching the s400 board aren't
> > if you have to re-send this series: can you please use the "arm64:
> > dts: meson-axg: s400:" prefix for all patches touching the s400 board?
> hum, do we really have such rule, or do you think we should add one ?
looking at the git history in arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic: it seems
that we don't have a rule yet, even though some (some of
your's/Neil's/my) patches were using that naming schema in the past
> Kevin, do you have opinion ?
> Not that I really mind either way, but prefixes rules are usually there to help
> maintainer filter the patches. Will such rule help in any way ?
maybe it's just a problem of a false initial impression
I read "arm64: dts: meson-axg: add usb power regulator" in the
cover-letter and came to the conclusion that this patch must be wrong
since meson-axg.dtsi should not have any regulators (unless they're
built into the SoC). only when looking at the patch itself I realized
that it's fine because it patches the s400.dts