Re: [PATCH v4 00/11] hugetlb: Factorize hugetlb architecture primitives

From: Alexandre Ghiti
Date: Fri Jul 27 2018 - 02:52:44 EST

Hi Mike,

Thanks for your review. I'm going to fix the 2nd patch as you said, you're right, no need to move the #include at the bottom of the file.
I'm going to post a v5, add -mm in cc and ask for inclusion in their tree.

Thanks again for your time,


On 07/26/2018 09:16 PM, Mike Kravetz wrote:
On 07/26/2018 04:46 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

On 07/20/2018 11:37 AM, Alex Ghiti wrote:
Does anyone have any suggestion about those patches ?
I only took a quick look. From the hugetlb perspective, I like the
idea of moving routines to a common file. If any of the arch owners
(or anyone else) agree, I can do a review of the series.
The conversions look pretty good to me. If you want to give it a review
then from my point of view it could go in -mm to shake out any bugs.
Nothing of significance found in a review. As others have suggested,
the (cross)compiler may be better at finding issues than human eyes.

I also suggest it be added to -mm.