Re: [PATCH] drm/rockchip: Convert drm_atomic_helper_suspend/resume()

From: Souptick Joarder
Date: Wed Aug 01 2018 - 08:43:52 EST

On Wed, Aug 1, 2018 at 6:03 PM, Heiko Stuebner <heiko@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Souptick,
> Am Dienstag, 31. Juli 2018, 22:34:30 CEST schrieb Souptick Joarder:
>> convert drm_atomic_helper_suspend/resume() to use
>> drm_mode_config_helper_suspend/resume().
>> With this conversion, rockchip_drm_fb_resume() and
>> rockchip_drm_fb_suspend() will not be used anymore.
>> Both of these functions can be removed.
>> Also, in struct rockchip_drm_private state will not be
>> used anymore. So this can be removed forever.
>> Signed-off-by: Souptick Joarder <jrdr.linux@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Ajit Negi <ajitn.linux@xxxxxxxxx>
> the patch itself looks great, just a simple bookkeeping question.
> What role did Ajit play in creating the patch? If I remember correctly
> it is meant to be
> - 1st Signed-off: Patch-Author
> - 2nd Signed-off: E-Mail sender + patch possibly patch changes
> (optional of course if the same)
> So was this meant to be a Reviewed-by from Ajit?

We both are working together for these patches to
convert drm_atomic_helper_suspend/resume().
That's the reason to add his name in 2nd Signed-off
in all similar patches.

Is it a incorrect way to put 2nd Signed-off here ?