Re: [PATCH 0/4] xen: various cleanups

From: Boris Ostrovsky
Date: Tue Aug 07 2018 - 12:42:55 EST


On 08/07/2018 11:21 AM, Juergen Gross wrote:
> On 07/08/18 16:00, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
>> On 08/07/2018 09:10 AM, Juergen Gross wrote:
>>> On 17/07/18 14:01, Juergen Gross wrote:
>>>> Some Xen related cleanups:
>>>> - move some pv-only code from CONFIG_XEN to CONFIG_XEN_PV
>>>> - use CONFIG_XEN_PVHVM in Makefile instead of #ifdef around a complete source
>>>> - add SPDX identifier where missing
>>>>
>>>> Juergen Gross (4):
>>>> xen: move pv irq related functions under CONFIG_XEN_PV umbrella
>>>> xen: move pv specific parts of arch/x86/xen/mmu.c to mmu_pv.c
>>>> xen: link platform-pci-unplug.o only if CONFIG_XEN_PVHVM
>>>> xen: add SPDX identifier in arch/x86/xen files
>>>>
>>>> arch/x86/entry/entry_32.S | 8 +-
>>>> arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S | 8 +-
>>>> arch/x86/xen/Makefile | 41 ++++++--
>>>> arch/x86/xen/efi.c | 14 +--
>>>> arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c | 2 +
>>>> arch/x86/xen/enlighten_hvm.c | 2 +
>>>> arch/x86/xen/grant-table.c | 25 +----
>>>> arch/x86/xen/mmu.c | 188 +------------------------------------
>>>> arch/x86/xen/mmu_pv.c | 140 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>> arch/x86/xen/p2m.c | 2 +
>>>> arch/x86/xen/pci-swiotlb-xen.c | 2 +
>>>> arch/x86/xen/platform-pci-unplug.c | 18 +---
>>>> arch/x86/xen/vdso.h | 2 +
>>>> arch/x86/xen/xen-pvh.S | 15 +--
>>>> include/xen/interface/memory.h | 6 --
>>>> include/xen/xen-ops.h | 133 +++++++++++++++++---------
>>>> 16 files changed, 287 insertions(+), 319 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>> Boris, any objections?
>>
>> This series had my R-b, but I was waiting for x86 maintainers to ack the
>> first patch.
>>
>> But now that I looked at this again, I wonder whether
>>
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_XEN
>> ÂBUILD_INTERRUPT3(xen_hvm_callback_vector, HYPERVISOR_CALLBACK_VECTOR,
>> ÂÂÂÂ ÂÂÂ Âxen_evtchn_do_upcall)
>> +#endif
>>
>>
>> and
>>
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_XEN
>> Âapicinterrupt3 HYPERVISOR_CALLBACK_VECTOR \
>> ÂÂÂÂ xen_hvm_callback_vector xen_evtchn_do_upcall
>> +#endif
>>
>>
>> should be under XEN_PVHVM
> Hmm, right. Do you want to change that while committing or should I send
> V2?


This still needs an ack from x86 folks. And include/xen/events.h may
need some additional ifdefery for xen_hvm_callback_vector().

So a v2 (for this patch only) would be good.

-boris