[PATCH 11/21] staging:rtl8192u: Rename DssCCk - Style

[John Whitmore]

Rename the bitfield member 'DssCCk' to 'dss_cck', this clears the
checkpatch issue with CamelCase naming.

This is a coding style change which should not impact on runtime
code execution.

Signed-off-by: John Whitmore <johnfwhitmore@xxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/staging/rtl8192u/ieee80211/rtl819x_HT.h     | 2 +-
 drivers/staging/rtl8192u/ieee80211/rtl819x_HTProc.c | 8 ++++----
 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/ieee80211/rtl819x_HT.h b/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/ieee80211/rtl819x_HT.h
index e4693832e1d6..fd04461bcaf8 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/ieee80211/rtl819x_HT.h
+++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/ieee80211/rtl819x_HT.h
@@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ struct ht_capability_ele {
 	u8	not_used_rx_stbc:2;
 	u8	not_used_delay_ba:1;
 	u8	max_amsdu_size:1;
-	u8	DssCCk:1;
+	u8	dss_cck:1;
 	u8	PSMP:1;
 	u8	Rsvd1:1;
 	u8	LSigTxopProtect:1;
diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/ieee80211/rtl819x_HTProc.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/ieee80211/rtl819x_HTProc.c
index 7fb31638f60d..299d486fad0d 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/ieee80211/rtl819x_HTProc.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/ieee80211/rtl819x_HTProc.c
@@ -146,7 +146,7 @@ void HTDebugHTCapability(u8 *CapIE, u8 *TitleString)
 	IEEE80211_DEBUG(IEEE80211_DL_HT,  "\tSupport Short GI for 20M = %s\n", (pCapELE->short_gi20_mhz) ? "YES" : "NO");
 	IEEE80211_DEBUG(IEEE80211_DL_HT,  "\tSupport Short GI for 40M = %s\n", (pCapELE->short_gi40_mhz) ? "YES" : "NO");
 	IEEE80211_DEBUG(IEEE80211_DL_HT,  "\tMax AMSDU Size = %s\n", (pCapELE->max_amsdu_size) ? "3839" : "7935");
-	IEEE80211_DEBUG(IEEE80211_DL_HT,  "\tSupport CCK in 20/40 mode = %s\n", (pCapELE->DssCCk) ? "YES" : "NO");
+	IEEE80211_DEBUG(IEEE80211_DL_HT,  "\tSupport CCK in 20/40 mode = %s\n", (pCapELE->dss_cck) ? "YES" : "NO");
 	IEEE80211_DEBUG(IEEE80211_DL_HT,  "\tMax AMPDU Factor = %d\n", pCapELE->MaxRxAMPDUFactor);
 	IEEE80211_DEBUG(IEEE80211_DL_HT,  "\tMPDU Density = %d\n", pCapELE->MPDUDensity);
 	IEEE80211_DEBUG(IEEE80211_DL_HT,  "\tMCS Rate Set = [%x][%x][%x][%x][%x]\n", pCapELE->MCS[0],\
@@ -561,7 +561,7 @@ void HTConstructCapabilityElement(struct ieee80211_device *ieee, u8 *posHTCap, u
 	//DbgPrint("TX HT cap/info ele BW=%d SG20=%d SG40=%d\n\r",
 	//pCapELE->chl_width, pCapELE->short_gi20_mhz, pCapELE->short_gi40_mhz);
 	pCapELE->max_amsdu_size	        = (MAX_RECEIVE_BUFFER_SIZE >= 7935) ? 1 : 0;
-	pCapELE->DssCCk			= ((pHT->bRegBW40MHz) ? (pHT->bRegSuppCCK ? 1 : 0) : 0);
+	pCapELE->dss_cck		= ((pHT->bRegBW40MHz) ? (pHT->bRegSuppCCK ? 1 : 0) : 0);
 	pCapELE->PSMP			= 0; // Do not support now!!
 	pCapELE->LSigTxopProtect	= 0; // Do not support now!!
 
@@ -569,7 +569,7 @@ void HTConstructCapabilityElement(struct ieee80211_device *ieee, u8 *posHTCap, u
 	 * MAC HT parameters info
 	 * TODO: Nedd to take care of this part
 	 */
-	IEEE80211_DEBUG(IEEE80211_DL_HT, "TX HT cap/info ele BW=%d max_amsdu_size:%d DssCCk:%d\n", pCapELE->chl_width, pCapELE->max_amsdu_size, pCapELE->DssCCk);
+	IEEE80211_DEBUG(IEEE80211_DL_HT, "TX HT cap/info ele BW=%d max_amsdu_size:%d dss_cck:%d\n", pCapELE->chl_width, pCapELE->max_amsdu_size, pCapELE->dss_cck);
 
 	if (IsEncrypt) {
 		pCapELE->MPDUDensity	= 7; // 8us
@@ -956,7 +956,7 @@ void HTOnAssocRsp(struct ieee80211_device *ieee)
 	 * TODO:
 	 */
 	pHTInfo->bCurSuppCCK = pHTInfo->bRegSuppCCK &&
-			       (pPeerHTCap->DssCCk == 1);
+			       (pPeerHTCap->dss_cck == 1);
 
 	/*
 	 * Config and configure A-MSDU setting
-- 
2.18.0