Re: [PATCH net] net: phy: sfp: Prevent NULL deference of socket_ops

From: Florian Fainelli
Date: Mon Sep 17 2018 - 13:31:06 EST


On 09/15/2018 12:32 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 04:01:31PM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>> In case we have specified a SFP and an I2C phandle in the Device Tree,
>> but we somehow failed to look up the I2C adapter (e.g: the driver is not
>> enabled), we will leave dangling socket_ops, and the sfp_bus will still
>> have been registered. We can then observe NULL pointer dereferences
>> while doing ethtool -m:
>>
>> [ 20.218613] Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 00000008
>> [ 20.226977] pgd = (ptrval)
>> [ 20.229785] [00000008] *pgd=7c400831, *pte=00000000, *ppte=00000000
>> [ 20.236274] Internal error: Oops: 17 [#1] SMP ARM
>> [ 20.241122] Modules linked in:
>> [ 20.244278] CPU: 0 PID: 1480 Comm: ethtool Not tainted 4.19.0-rc3 #138
>> [ 20.251013] Hardware name: Broadcom Northstar Plus SoC
>> [ 20.256316] PC is at sfp_get_module_info+0x8/0x10
>> [ 20.261172] LR is at dev_ethtool+0x218c/0x2afc
>>
>> Specifically guard against that.
>
> The other alternative to this would be to only set ndev->sfp_bus when
> the bus moves to registered state, which would probably be a saner
> alternative than to add an additional layer of tests. IOW:

Indeed, your patch works for me:

Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@xxxxxxxxx>

>
> drivers/net/phy/sfp-bus.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/sfp-bus.c b/drivers/net/phy/sfp-bus.c
> index 48ca980f5c96..c4c2b5269216 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/phy/sfp-bus.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/phy/sfp-bus.c
> @@ -362,6 +362,7 @@ static int sfp_register_bus(struct sfp_bus *bus)
> }
> if (bus->started)
> bus->socket_ops->start(bus->sfp);
> + bus->netdev->sfp_bus = bus;
> bus->registered = true;
> return 0;
> }
> @@ -370,6 +371,7 @@ static void sfp_unregister_bus(struct sfp_bus *bus)
> {
> const struct sfp_upstream_ops *ops = bus->upstream_ops;
>
> + bus->netdev->sfp_bus = NULL;
> if (bus->registered) {
> if (bus->started)
> bus->socket_ops->stop(bus->sfp);
> @@ -451,7 +453,6 @@ static void sfp_upstream_clear(struct sfp_bus *bus)
> {
> bus->upstream_ops = NULL;
> bus->upstream = NULL;
> - bus->netdev->sfp_bus = NULL;
> bus->netdev = NULL;
> }
>
> @@ -480,7 +481,6 @@ struct sfp_bus *sfp_register_upstream(struct fwnode_handle *fwnode,
> bus->upstream_ops = ops;
> bus->upstream = upstream;
> bus->netdev = ndev;
> - ndev->sfp_bus = bus;
>
> if (bus->sfp) {
> ret = sfp_register_bus(bus);
>


--
Florian