Re: [PATCH 0/9] AHCI and SATA PHY support for BCM63138

[Florian Fainelli]

On September 29, 2018 7:35:14 PM PDT, Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>On 9/29/18 2:56 AM, Tejun Heo wrote:
>> On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 03:41:23PM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>>> On 09/25/2018 09:12 AM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>>>> On 09/24/2018 11:19 PM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
>>>>> On Friday 21 September 2018 12:49 AM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>>>>>> On 09/20/2018 12:16 PM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>>>>>>> Hi Kishon, Tejun,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This patch series adds support for the SATA AHCI and PHY found
>on the
>>>>>>> ARM-basd BCM63138 DSL SoCs.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It would probably make sense for patches 1-3 to go through
>Kishon's
>>>>>>> tree, patches 4-7 through Tejun's tree, and I would be merging
>the last
>>>>>>> two patches through the Broadcom ARM-SoC tree.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Let me know if this is not a workable plan, thank you very much!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Looks like I had left patches with the incorrect subject, please
>>>>>> disregard the following patches:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [PATCH 2/9] phy: broadcom: allow PHY_BRCM_SATA driver to be built
>for
>>>>>> DSL SoCs
>>>>>> [PATCH 5/9] ata: sata_brcmstb: Allow optional reset controller to
>be used
>>>>>> [PATCH 6/9] ata: ahci_brcmstb: Match 63138 compatible strings
>>>>>>
>>>>>> since they have incorrect/inconsistent titles, the other patches
>are
>>>>>> fine though. Sorry about that.
>>>>>
>>>>> merged the first 3 patches to linux-phy tree.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks a lot Kishon!
>>>
>>> Tejun, are you good with picking up patches 4-7 and I take the last
>two?
>>> Can you make sure you pick up the ones that contain "ahci_brcm" in
>their
>>> subject, I had incorrectly formatted them initially, sorry again
>about that.
>> 
>> Jens is running the libata tree now.  Jens?
>
>I looked over them, but the series seems somewhat messed up. Can you
>resend 4-7?

Certainly, I accidentally sent duplicates that I had left in the directory.

-- 
Florian