Re: [PATCH RFC] proc: Don't retain negative dentries
From: Ahmad Fatoum
Date: Mon Oct 08 2018 - 13:02:15 EST
On 10/8/18 6:55 PM, Al Viro wrote:
> What the hell does that have to do with negative dentries anywhere???
It's possible that this needs fixing at another place. I don't know,
but this seems to work for me, that's why I prefixed with RFC.
> NAK. Rationale makes no sense _and_ the patch has nothing to do
> with claimed rationale.
Please CC me when this gets fixed properly. I am curious. :-)