Re: [PATCH] KEYS: trusted: fix -Wvarags warning
From: James Bottomley
Date: Fri Oct 12 2018 - 11:22:52 EST
On Fri, 2018-10-12 at 10:13 -0500, Denis Kenzior wrote:
> Hi James,
> > > So can't we simply use 'bool' or uint32 as the type for h3
> > > instead of re-ordering everything
> > The problem is the standard is ambiguious. The only thing that's
> > guaranteed to work for all time is a char *. If you want to keep
> > the order, what I'd suggest is inserting a dummy pointer argument
> > which is always expected to be NULL between the h3 and the varargs.
> So maybe I'm misunderstanding something, but the issue seems to be
> that unsigned char is promoted to 'unsigned char *' by Clang and
> probably unsigned int or int by gcc.
> So instead of having unsigned char h3, can't we simply have bool h3
> or unsigned int h3?
Given the ambiguity in the standards, the safe thing that will work for
all time and all potential compilers is a char *