On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 03:57:35PM -0700, Atish Patra wrote:
On 10/10/18 6:49 AM, Thierry Reding wrote:It seems fairly superfluous to me to have a version number in additon to
On Tue, Oct 09, 2018 at 11:51:22AM -0700, Atish Patra wrote:I think yes. Since fu540 is the first Linux capable RISC-V core, SiFive Guys
+Required properties:What's the '0' in here? A version number?
+- compatible: should be one of
decided mark it as version 0.
@Wesly: Please correct me if I am wrong.
the fu540-c000, which already seems to be the core plus some sort of
part number. Do you really expect there to be any changes in the SoC
that would require a different compatible string at this point? If the
SoC has taped out, how will you ever get a different version of the PWM
IP in it?
I would expect any improvements or changes to the PWM IP to show up in a
different SoC generation, at which point it would be something like
"sifive,fu640-c000" maybe, or perhaps "sifive,fu540-d000", or whatever
the numbering is.