Re: [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: Mark pinned shmemfs pages as unevictable
From: Michal Hocko
Date: Tue Oct 16 2018 - 15:13:58 EST
On Tue 16-10-18 19:31:06, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Quoting Michal Hocko (2018-10-16 19:21:55)
> > On Wed 17-10-18 01:43:00, Kuo-Hsin Yang wrote:
> > > The i915 driver use shmemfs to allocate backing storage for gem objects.
> > > These shmemfs pages can be pinned (increased ref count) by
> > > shmem_read_mapping_page_gfp(). When a lot of pages are pinned, vmscan
> > > wastes a lot of time scanning these pinned pages. Mark these pinned
> > > pages as unevictable to speed up vmscan.
> > I would squash the two patches into the single one. One more thing
> > though. One more thing to be careful about here. Unless I miss something
> > such a page is not migrateable so it shouldn't be allocated from a
> > movable zone. Does mapping_gfp_constraint contains __GFP_MOVABLE? If
> > yes, we want to drop it as well. Other than that the patch makes sense
> > with my very limited knowlege of the i915 code of course.
> They are not migrateable today. But we have proposed hooking up
> .migratepage and setting __GFP_MOVABLE which would then include unlocking
> the mapping at migrate time.
if the mapping_gfp doesn't include __GFP_MOVABLE today then there is no
issue I've had in mind.