Re: [PATCH 1/2] sched/cpufreq: Reorganize the cpufreq files
From: Daniel Lezcano
Date: Thu Oct 18 2018 - 06:13:49 EST
On 18/10/2018 12:06, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 11:54 AM Daniel Lezcano
> <daniel.lezcano@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On 18/10/2018 11:42, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>> On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 11:36 AM Daniel Lezcano
>>> <daniel.lezcano@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>> It was suggested to set the scene for the PM components in the
>>>> scheduler code organization in the recent discussion about making the
>>>> scheduler aware of the capacity capping from the thermal framework.
>>>> Move the cpufreq files into its own directory as suggested at:
>>> Fair enough, but do we need to do that right now?
>> I'm not planning to do more code reorg than this patch right now. Up to
>> you to decide if you are willing to take them.
> The SPDX one certainly is applicable, but I'm not sure about the other one TBH.
> Why don't you add the SPDX IDs to those files as they are for now?
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org â Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |