Re: [PATCH 2/3] i2c:ocores: do not handle IRQ if IF is not set
From: Wolfram Sang
Date: Mon Oct 29 2018 - 04:53:09 EST
On Sun, Oct 21, 2018 at 04:12:10PM +0200, Peter Korsgaard wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 6:14 PM Federico Vaga <federico.vaga@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> > If the Interrupt Flag (IF) is not set, we should not handle the IRQ:
> > - the line can be shared with other devices
> > - it can be a spurious interrupt
> > To avoid reading twice the status register, the ocores_process() function
> > expects it to be read by the caller.
> > Signed-off-by: Federico Vaga <federico.vaga@xxxxxxx>
> Looks good.
> Acked-by: Peter Korsgaard <peter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
I assume this patch will be resent when the other patches get updated?
Or shall I pick this one independently of the others?
Description: PGP signature