Re: Re: [PATCH] fs/proc: introduce /proc/stat2 file
From: Alexey Dobriyan
Date: Mon Oct 29 2018 - 19:34:21 EST
> I'd much rather move to a model in which userspace *explicitly* tells
> the kernel which fields it wants, with the kernel replying with just
> those particular fields, maybe in their raw binary representations.
> The ASCII-text bag-of-everything files would remain available for
> ad-hoc and non-performance critical use, but programs that cared about
> performance would have an efficient bypass. One concrete approach is
> to let users open up today's proc files and, instead of read(2)ing a
> text blob, use an ioctl to retrieve specified and targeted information
> of the sort that would normally be encoded in the text blob. Because
> callers would open the same file when using either the text or binary
> interfaces, little would have to change, and it'd be easy to implement
> fallbacks when a particular system doesn't support a particular
> fast-path ioctl.
You've just reinvented systems calls.
I suspect the DB in question cares about CPU related numbers and nothing
else which can be nicely split from the rest of /proc/stat.