RE: [PATCH 0/3] RISC-V: A few build/warning fixes and cleanup

From: Li, Philip
Date: Wed Oct 31 2018 - 22:19:34 EST

> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] RISC-V: A few build/warning fixes and cleanup
> CC Philip, current kbuild test robot maintainer.
> On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 12:12:21PM -0600, Logan Gunthorpe wrote:
> >
> >On 2018-10-31 11:52 a.m., Olof Johansson wrote:
> >> I've migrated machines to a new system and that CI is up and running.
> >> Right now the emails don't go anywhere but me, but let me know where
> >> you want them sent and I'll be happy to do so (probably not
> >> linux-riscv due to volume/noise). They're also uploaded to
> >>
> >>
> >> Since you keep single-patch branches in your tree, and I compile
> >> everything for every branch, I've restricted what branches I poll and
> >> build. Right now it's "for*" and "riscv*".
> >
> >I think it would also be very nice to get the existing kbuild test robot
> >to start compile testing a few riscv configs. It already does most of
thanks Logan, the support to riscv and nds32 has been in our TODO list for
a while, but whole team is blocked by other effort. We will focus on this soon
to complete it within 2-3 weeks.

> >the other arches. This would help us catch these kinds of issues even
> >earlier seeing that test robot tests patches on mailing lists and many
> >other repos before Palmer would even pull them into his branch.
> >(Including a repo I routinely push branches to before sending out patches.)
> >
> >I'm not sure who's currently responsible for the robot but I've copied
> >Fenguang who, I believe, set it up originally as well as the kbuild
> >lists. Hopefully he can point us in the right direction to help get this
> >set up.
> >
> >Thanks,
> >
> >Logan
> >