[PATCH 4.19 027/205] powerpc/memtrace: Remove memory in chunks

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

4.19-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Rashmica Gupta <rashmica.g@xxxxxxxxx>

[ Upstream commit 3f7daf3d7582dc6628ac40a9045dd1bbd80c5f35 ]

When hot-removing memory release_mem_region_adjustable() splits iomem
resources if they are not the exact size of the memory being
hot-deleted. Adding this memory back to the kernel adds a new resource.

Eg a node has memory 0x0 - 0xfffffffff. Hot-removing 1GB from
0xf40000000 results in the single resource 0x0-0xfffffffff being split
into two resources: 0x0-0xf3fffffff and 0xf80000000-0xfffffffff.

When we hot-add the memory back we now have three resources:
0x0-0xf3fffffff, 0xf40000000-0xf7fffffff, and 0xf80000000-0xfffffffff.

This is an issue if we try to remove some memory that overlaps
resources. Eg when trying to remove 2GB at address 0xf40000000,
release_mem_region_adjustable() fails as it expects the chunk of memory
to be within the boundaries of a single resource. We then get the
warning: "Unable to release resource" and attempting to use memtrace
again gives us this error: "bash: echo: write error: Resource
temporarily unavailable"

This patch makes memtrace remove memory in chunks that are always the
same size from an address that is always equal to end_of_memory -
n*size, for some n. So hotremoving and hotadding memory of different
sizes will now not attempt to remove memory that spans multiple
resources.

Signed-off-by: Rashmica Gupta <rashmica.g@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/memtrace.c |   21 ++++++++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/memtrace.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/memtrace.c
@@ -90,17 +90,15 @@ static bool memtrace_offline_pages(u32 n
 	walk_memory_range(start_pfn, end_pfn, (void *)MEM_OFFLINE,
 			  change_memblock_state);
 
-	lock_device_hotplug();
-	remove_memory(nid, start_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT, nr_pages << PAGE_SHIFT);
-	unlock_device_hotplug();
 
 	return true;
 }
 
 static u64 memtrace_alloc_node(u32 nid, u64 size)
 {
-	u64 start_pfn, end_pfn, nr_pages;
+	u64 start_pfn, end_pfn, nr_pages, pfn;
 	u64 base_pfn;
+	u64 bytes = memory_block_size_bytes();
 
 	if (!node_spanned_pages(nid))
 		return 0;
@@ -113,8 +111,21 @@ static u64 memtrace_alloc_node(u32 nid,
 	end_pfn = round_down(end_pfn - nr_pages, nr_pages);
 
 	for (base_pfn = end_pfn; base_pfn > start_pfn; base_pfn -= nr_pages) {
-		if (memtrace_offline_pages(nid, base_pfn, nr_pages) == true)
+		if (memtrace_offline_pages(nid, base_pfn, nr_pages) == true) {
+			/*
+			 * Remove memory in memory block size chunks so that
+			 * iomem resources are always split to the same size and
+			 * we never try to remove memory that spans two iomem
+			 * resources.
+			 */
+			lock_device_hotplug();
+			end_pfn = base_pfn + nr_pages;
+			for (pfn = base_pfn; pfn < end_pfn; pfn += bytes>> PAGE_SHIFT) {
+				remove_memory(nid, pfn << PAGE_SHIFT, bytes);
+			}
+			unlock_device_hotplug();
 			return base_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT;
+		}
 	}
 
 	return 0;