Re: [PATCH 2/2] perf report: Display average IPC and IPC coverage per symbol

From: Jiri Olsa
Date: Tue Nov 27 2018 - 04:35:01 EST


On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 11:42:12AM +0800, Jin, Yao wrote:
>
>
> On 11/26/2018 5:55 PM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 05:40:54PM +0800, Jin Yao wrote:
> >
> > SNIP
> >
> > > diff --git a/tools/perf/util/sort.c b/tools/perf/util/sort.c
> > > index f96c005..94f62c8 100644
> > > --- a/tools/perf/util/sort.c
> > > +++ b/tools/perf/util/sort.c
> > > @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
> > > #include "strlist.h"
> > > #include <traceevent/event-parse.h>
> > > #include "mem-events.h"
> > > +#include "annotate.h"
> > > #include <linux/kernel.h>
> > > regex_t parent_regex;
> > > @@ -422,6 +423,47 @@ struct sort_entry sort_srcline_to = {
> > > .se_width_idx = HISTC_SRCLINE_TO,
> > > };
> > > +static int hist_entry__sym_ipc_snprintf(struct hist_entry *he, char *bf,
> > > + size_t size, unsigned int width)
> > > +{
> > > +
> > > + struct symbol *sym = he->ms.sym;
> > > + struct map *map = he->ms.map;
> > > + struct perf_evsel *evsel = hists_to_evsel(he->hists);
> > > + struct annotation *notes;
> > > + double ipc = 0.0, coverage = 0.0;
> > > + char tmp[64];
> > > +
> > > + if (!sym)
> > > + return repsep_snprintf(bf, size, "%-*s", width, "-");
> > > +
> > > + if (!sym->annotated &&
> > > + symbol__annotate2(sym, map, evsel, &annotation__default_options,
> > > + NULL) < 0) {
> > > + return 0;
> > > + }
> >
> > this seems to make the sorting extra long, would you
> > please consider progress bar update for this?
> >
> > should be added somewhere around hists sorting code
> >
>
> Hi Jiri,
>
> Sorting doesn't take long time in my test but the session event processing
> takes some time.
>
> I just think maybe we need a new ops for stdio progress bar like what the
> tui_progress__ops does now. That should be benefit for all stdio usages.
>
> That may be another separate patch-set.

sure, thanks

jirka