Re: [PATCH] x86/fpu: XRSTOR is expected to raise #GP

From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
Date: Wed Nov 28 2018 - 10:35:02 EST

Next message: Ard Biesheuvel: "Re: [PATCH 2/2] arm64: preempt: Provide our own implementation of asm/preempt.h"
Previous message: Colin King: "[PATCH] [media] tda7432: fix spelling mistake "maximium" -> "maximum""
In reply to: David Laight: "RE: [PATCH] x86/fpu: XRSTOR is expected to raise #GP"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On 2018-11-28 15:27:28 [+0000], David Laight wrote:
> Better still note it in the code.

I'm in favour of adding something to tools/testing/selftests/x86/.

> David

Sebastian

Next message: Ard Biesheuvel: "Re: [PATCH 2/2] arm64: preempt: Provide our own implementation of asm/preempt.h"
Previous message: Colin King: "[PATCH] [media] tda7432: fix spelling mistake "maximium" -> "maximum""
In reply to: David Laight: "RE: [PATCH] x86/fpu: XRSTOR is expected to raise #GP"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]