Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] x86/static_call: Add inline static call implementation for x86-64

[Jiri Kosina]

On Thu, 29 Nov 2018, Andy Lutomirski wrote:

> Does anyone know what the actual hardware semantics are?  The SDM is not 
> particularly informative unless I looked at the wrong section.

I don't think SDM answers all the questions there, unfortunately.

I vaguely remember that back then when I was preparing the original 
text_poke_bp() implementation, hpa had to provide some answers directly 
from inner depths of Intel ... see fd4363fff3 ("x86: Introduce int3 
(breakpoint)-based instruction patching") for reference.

-- 
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs