Re: Linux-next: Build failed

From: Naresh Kamboju
Date: Tue Dec 04 2018 - 09:46:53 EST


Hi Will,

On Tue, 4 Dec 2018 at 18:22, Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi Naresh,
>
> On Tue, Dec 04, 2018 at 05:56:09PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> > FYI,
> >
> > The Linux -next build failed due to below warnings/errors.
> >
> > include/asm-generic/bitops/atomic.h: In function 'set_bit':
> > include/asm-generic/bitops/atomic.h:17:2: error: implicit declaration
> > of function 'atomic_long_or'; did you mean '__atomic_load_n'?
> > [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> > atomic_long_or(BIT_MASK(nr), (atomic_long_t *)p);
> > ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > __atomic_load_n
>
> Ha, I like that the compiler is trying to get us to use its __atomic
> builtins here :)
>
> Anyway, you're seeing this because of this previous error in Mark's script:
>
> .../scripts/atomic/atomic-tbl.sh: line 183: fold: command not found
>
> even though fold is part of coreutils :/
>
> Do you have grep? Maybe the diff below helps.

Yes. grep is present.
Thanks for the quick patch.

- Naresh

>
> Will
>
> --->8
>
> diff --git a/scripts/atomic/atomic-tbl.sh b/scripts/atomic/atomic-tbl.sh
> index 9d6be538a987..81d5c32039dd 100755
> --- a/scripts/atomic/atomic-tbl.sh
> +++ b/scripts/atomic/atomic-tbl.sh
> @@ -180,7 +180,7 @@ gen_proto_variants()
> #gen_proto(meta, ...)
> gen_proto() {
> local meta="$1"; shift
> - for m in $(echo "${meta}" | fold -w1); do
> + for m in $(echo "${meta}" | grep -o .); do
> gen_proto_variants "${m}" "$@"
> done
> }
>