Re: [PATCH net-next v2 1/4] indirect call wrappers: helpers to speed-up indirect calls of builtin

[David Woodhouse]

On Fri, 2018-12-07 at 21:46 +0100, Paolo Abeni wrote:
> > I wonder if we can declare the common case functions as 'weak' so that
> > the link failures don't happen when they're absent.
> 
> I experimented a previous version with alias. I avoided weak alias
> usage, because I [mis?]understood not all compilers have a complete
> support for them (e.g. clang).
> Also, with weak ref, a coding error that is now discovered at build
> time will result in worse performance at runtime, likely with some
> uncommon configuration, possibly not as easily detected. I'm unsure
> that would be better ?!?

I think everything supports weak linkage; we've been using it for
years.

> > Once we extend this past the network code, especially to file systems'
> > f_ops, I suspect we're going to want to use something like static keys
> > to patch the common cases at runtime â perhaps changing the f_ops
> > default according to what the root file system is, etc.
> 
> I'm sorry, I don't follow here. I think static keys can't be used for
> the reported network case: we have different list elements each
> contaning a different function pointer and we access/use
> different ptr on a per packet basis.

Yes, the alternatives would be used to change the "likely" case.

We still do the "if (fn == default_fn) default_fn(); else (*fn)();"
part; or even the variant with two (or more) common cases. 

It's just that the value of 'default_fn' can be changed at runtime
(with patching like alternatives/static keys, since of course it has to
be a direct call).

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature