Re: [PATCH] clk: tegra: fix SMP build

[Jon Hunter]

On 11/12/2018 17:21, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting Arnd Bergmann (2018-12-11 06:35:07)
>> When CONFIG_SMP is disabled, the tegra clk driver now fails to build:
>>
>> drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra30.c: In function 'tegra30_cpu_rail_off_ready':
>> drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra30.c:1151:19: error: implicit declaration of function 'tegra_pmc_cpu_is_powered'; did you mean 'tegra_powergate_is_powered'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>>   cpu_pwr_status = tegra_pmc_cpu_is_powered(1) ||
>>
>> I don't know if tegra works without CONFIG_SMP, but we can get it to
>> build by making the calls conditional, and removing the pointless
>> ifdef around the declaration. The assumption now is that in a
>> non-SMP system, the secondary CPUs are always disabled.
>>
>> Fixes: 61866523ed6e ("clk: tegra30: Use Tegra CPU powergate helper function")
>> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> Not sure if this is the best solution. If you think it's not, please
>> submit a different fix.
> 
> Hmm.. Is there any reason why the implementation of
> tegra_pmc_cpu_is_powered() is under an ifdef CONFIG_SMP? I'd rather not
> have to think about SMP or not in this clk code and have the
> tegra_pmc_cpu_is_powered() function do the UP vs SMP code optimization.

Not that I know of. I just think that the function should/would not be
used for non-SMP.

I was actually thinking that we could just leave the clk code as it is
and simply drop the CONFIG_SMP from pmc.h. That would be fine with me.

Cheers
Jon

-- 
nvpublic