Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commits in the vfs tree

From: Al Viro
Date: Thu Dec 20 2018 - 16:05:49 EST


On Fri, Dec 21, 2018 at 07:45:22AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Al,
>
> Commits
>
> e6cf4b0ddae8 ("teach vfs_get_tree() to handle subtype, switch do_new_mount() to it")
> a5df92eef26f ("new helper: vfs_create_mount()")
> 84b9446c0cb2 ("mount_fs: suppress MAC on MS_SUBMOUNT as well as MS_KERNMOUNT")
> 6df9e604628d ("smack: rewrite smack_sb_eat_lsm_opts()")
> a4fdf6490284 ("smack: get rid of match_token()")
> b2130173efae ("smack: take the guts of smack_parse_opts_str() into a new helper")
> 324240b27f48 ("LSM: new method: ->sb_add_mnt_opt()")
> 8a2bfb0f835a ("selinux: rewrite selinux_sb_eat_lsm_opts()")
> 3cec2907c913 ("selinux: regularize Opt_... names a bit")
> b0ab2db616c0 ("selinux: switch away from match_token()")
> cbe9d96f42ba ("selinux: new helper - selinux_add_opt()")
> 2790a639b456 ("LSM: bury struct security_mnt_opts")
> 205b9b7a392a ("smack: switch to private smack_mnt_opts")
> 179a64d445e2 ("selinux: switch to private struct selinux_mnt_opts")
> cb662518822e ("LSM: hide struct security_mnt_opts from any generic code")
> 6c63bb2d5323 ("selinux: kill selinux_sb_get_mnt_opts()")
> e03db7f5411c ("LSM: turn sb_eat_lsm_opts() into a method")
> dc0dadb3c3d7 ("nfs_remount(): don't leak, don't ignore LSM options quietly")
> 363540f775fb ("btrfs: sanitize security_mnt_opts use")
> 8f08fcb05ba6 ("selinux; don't open-code a loop in sb_finish_set_opts()")
> 144da0858c5e ("LSM: split ->sb_set_mnt_opts() out of ->sb_kern_mount()")
> be917e5b8736 ("new helper: security_sb_eat_lsm_opts()")
> 580a8bcb268b ("LSM: lift extracting and parsing LSM options into the caller of ->sb_remount()")
> cf891373b60a ("LSM: lift parsing LSM options into the caller of ->sb_kern_mount()")
> d02fc3452738 ("smack: make smack_parse_opts_str() clean up on failure")
> 17f3b556a3e3 ("selinux: expand superblock_doinit() calls")
>
> are missing a Signed-off-by from their committers.

What the... Oh, I see - that's David adding his reviewed-by and somehow
losing my S-o-b in process... *grumble*

Will be fixed in tomorrow push.