Re: [PATCH 4.14 00/27] 4.14.94-stable review

From: Jon Hunter
Date: Wed Jan 16 2019 - 11:56:17 EST

On 16/01/2019 16:02, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 09:25:12AM +0000, Jon Hunter wrote:
>> On 15/01/2019 16:35, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.14.94 release.
>>> There are 27 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
>>> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
>>> let me know.
>>> Responses should be made by Thu Jan 17 15:48:28 UTC 2019.
>>> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>>> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>>> or in the git tree and branch at:
>>> git:// linux-4.14.y
>>> and the diffstat can be found below.
>>> thanks,
>>> greg k-h
>> All tests are passing for Tegra ...
>> Test results for stable-v4.14:
>> 8 builds: 8 pass, 0 fail
>> 16 boots: 16 pass, 0 fail
>> 14 tests: 14 pass, 0 fail
>> Linux version: 4.14.94-rc1-gec31b1a
>> Boards tested: tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra20-ventana,
>> tegra210-p2371-2180, tegra30-cardhu-a04
> Thanks for testing two of these.
> How about 4.19 and 4.20? Does modern kernels work on this hardware as
> well? :)

We are not that advanced yet ;-)

Only joking, absolutely and in fact we have more devices/boards
supported in newer kernels so it would make sense. We are also testing
mainline and -next.

Unfortunately, it is a bit of a process to add new branches at the
moment simply because we are piggy backing on existing infrastructure
for testing that I personally do not own and so it needs to be approved.
However, nonetheless it is doable.

We were talking about adding v4.19 and then v4.20 popped up. I am not
sure if you have any ideas yet about the EOL for v4.20? I was just
wondering if we should prioritise v4.20 now over v4.19?