Re: [PATCH 10/13] arm64: dts: qcom: qcs404: Add HFPLL node

From: Stephen Boyd
Date: Tue Jan 22 2019 - 13:49:06 EST


Quoting Bjorn Andersson (2019-01-16 22:38:04)
> On Mon 17 Dec 11:39 PST 2018, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>
> > Quoting Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz (2018-12-17 01:46:27)
> > > The high frequency pll functionality is required to enable CPU
> > > frequency scaling operation.
> > >
> > > Co-developed-by: Niklas Cassel <niklas.cassel@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Signed-off-by: Niklas Cassel <niklas.cassel@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Signed-off-by: Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz <jorge.ramirez-ortiz@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > > arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcs404.dtsi | 9 +++++++++
> > > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcs404.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcs404.dtsi
> > > index 4594fea7..ec3f6c7 100644
> > > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcs404.dtsi
> > > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcs404.dtsi
> > > @@ -375,6 +375,15 @@
> > > #mbox-cells = <1>;
> > > };
> > >
> > > + apcs_hfpll: clock-controller@0b016000 {
> >
> > Drop leading 0 on unit address please.
> >
> > > + compatible = "qcom,hfpll";
> > > + reg = <0x0b016000 0x30>;
> >
> > Wow that is small!
> >
>
> I double checked and it's actually 0x34, but the last register is
> protected.
>

Ok, so then it should be 0x34? I don't think we've left out protected
registers from the size before.