Re: [PATCH 1/2] spi: support inter-word delay requirement for devices
From: Mark Brown
Date: Fri Jan 25 2019 - 12:50:38 EST
On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 05:47:13PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 01:06:45PM +0100, Jonas Bonn wrote:
> > Having this as device property rather than a transfer property allows this
> > to be configured one time in setup() rather than having to fiddle with the
> > configuration register for every transfer.
> That doesn't mean that the coniguration should be done in DT though, and
> given that this presumably is a property of the device there seems to be
> no reason why we'd have it in DT - if every instance of the device is
> going to need to set the property we should just figure it out from the
> compatble string instead.
To be clear here: the suggestion is to add a parameter the slave device
can set in spi_device which sets the default word_delay similarly to how
Description: PGP signature