Re: [PATCH v2 10/10] spi: atmel-quadspi: add support for sam9x60 qspi controller

From: Tudor.Ambarus
Date: Fri Feb 01 2019 - 09:49:35 EST




On 02/01/2019 09:57 AM, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> On Fri, 1 Feb 2019 07:07:40 +0000
> <Tudor.Ambarus@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>>>
>>>> #define QSPI_IFR_TFRTYP_MASK GENMASK(13, 12)
>>>> #define QSPI_IFR_TFRTYP_TRSFR_READ (0 << 12)
>>>> #define QSPI_IFR_TFRTYP_TRSFR_READ_MEM (1 << 12)
>>>
>>> Looks like the read/write flag is on bit 13. Can we just add
>>
>> for sama5d2 only
>
> Feel free to prefix macros with the SoC name to make it clear:
>
> #define QSPI_IFR_SAMA5D2_WRITE_TRSFR BIT(13)

agreed

>

cut

>>>> +#define QSPI_IFR_APBTFRTYP_READ BIT(24)
>
> And this one would be
>
> define QSPI_IFR_SAM9X60_READ_TRSFR BIT(24)

I prefer letting this bit named as in the datasheet, QSPI_IFR_APBTFRTYP_READ,
and change it if future versions of the IP will modify its sense. It is a READ
transfer done on APB, it is more generic this way. If you have a strong opinion
on this, please let me know.

ta