RE: [PATCH -next] remoteproc: make rproc_check_carveout_da static

[Loic PALLARDY]

Hi Yue,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: linux-remoteproc-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <linux-remoteproc-
> owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> On Behalf Of YueHaibing
> Sent: vendredi 1 février 2019 04:13
> To: ohad@xxxxxxxxxx; bjorn.andersson@xxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-remoteproc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> YueHaibing <yuehaibing@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: [PATCH -next] remoteproc: make rproc_check_carveout_da static
> 
> Fixes the following sparse warnings:
> 
> drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c:279:5: warning:
>  symbol 'rproc_check_carveout_da' was not declared. Should it be static?
Correction already sent on ML few weeks ago. See [1]

Regards,
Loic

[1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10755763/

> 
> Signed-off-by: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 5 +++--
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> index 54ec38f..5d4954d 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> @@ -276,8 +276,9 @@ rproc_find_carveout_by_name(struct rproc *rproc,
> const char *name, ...)
>   *
>   * Return: 0 if carveout match request else -ENOMEM
>   */
> -int rproc_check_carveout_da(struct rproc *rproc, struct rproc_mem_entry
> *mem,
> -			    u32 da, u32 len)
> +static int rproc_check_carveout_da(struct rproc *rproc,
> +				   struct rproc_mem_entry *mem,
> +				   u32 da, u32 len)
>  {
>  	struct device *dev = &rproc->dev;
>  	int delta = 0;
> --
> 2.7.0
>